Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03842

in Hampton, New HampshirePopulation 16,324

61.50/ 100

Ranked #3,807 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.9%)

Ranked #74 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #167 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

26.8%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.7%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.2%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.6%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

33.1%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.5%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

85.6%

in the top 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.9%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.4%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Hampton, New Hampshire (ZIP 03842) lands in the top 11.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,807th) and the top 30% of New Hampshire (74th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and housing insecurity is in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Modeled transportation settles in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and food insecurity resides in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Modeled colon screening registers in the top 5.7% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the other side, floodplain exposure lies in the top 8.7% nationally, PFOA in drinking water lands in the top 10.3% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water sits in the top 10.5% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 03833, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%28.0–33.2
High blood pressure among adults38.7%35.5–41.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.7%10.7–12.6
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Depression among adults21.5%18.8–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.7–42.9
Obesity among adults31.9%27.3–36.1
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.7%6.4–9.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.5–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.0–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%78.2–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults91.2%89.9–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.6%70.4–76.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.2%70.7–75.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.0%74.2–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%12.0–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%8.7–11.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.9%17.2–22.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.5%28.0–35.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.9%12.2–15.8
Frequent mental distress among adults13.8%12.3–15.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.9–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Any disability among adults25.7%23.0–28.7
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.1–8.9
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.5–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.9%16.5–21.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.5–6.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Loneliness among adults26.8%23.7–30.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–649.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle4.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription92.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate74.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population3.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households60.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+31.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age55.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$95,422$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$548,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,641$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured