Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23692

in Yorktown, VirginiaPopulation 19,301

63.25/ 100

Ranked #2,829 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.9%)

Ranked #101 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 11.6%)

Ranked #8 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (top 6.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.26 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

66.2%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.6%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.0%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.5%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Park land

14.0%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.3%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 23692, one of several in Yorktown, Virginia stands in the top 8.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,829th) and the top 11.6% of Virginia (101st).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: lead in tap water lies at the national minimum, and grocery is in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and transportation lies in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity is in the bottom 7.4% nationally, modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and park land lies in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled colon screening is in the top 6.5% nationally. By contrast, distance to a Superfund site registers at the national minimum, and modeled pfas lies in the top 5.6% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 23693, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%26.3–33.3
High blood pressure among adults35.0%30.8–39.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.3–11.3
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.9–6.5
Depression among adults21.7%18.4–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.7–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%36.1–45.0
Obesity among adults30.8%24.2–37.9
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.0%5.6–8.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.7%4.8–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%76.9–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.4–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%89.0–91.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.3%69.0–77.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.0%72.0–77.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.1%72.2–84.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.5–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.8%8.1–11.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.8%15.4–22.4
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%25.5–36.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.5%12.4–16.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.4–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.2–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.4%10.0–12.9
Any disability among adults27.0%23.1–31.0
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.1
Mobility disability among adults12.2%10.5–14.0
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.9%15.1–21.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.4–9.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
Loneliness among adults31.6%26.8–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.8–5.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–645.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)4.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription95.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate79.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population6.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households58.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+23.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age43.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$109,066$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$417,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,837$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 0.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.71 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured