Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03062

in Nashua, New HampshirePopulation 29,441

64.14/ 100

Ranked #2,371 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.4%)

Ranked #34 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (top 14.0%)

Ranked #7 of 34 Manchester-Nashua, NH ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.8%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.2%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.0%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.7%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.7%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.8%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 03062, one of several in Nashua, New Hampshire lands in the top 7.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,371st) and the top 14.0% of New Hampshire (34th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: lead in tap water sits at the national minimum, and modeled transportation is in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the top 4.4% nationally, and food insecurity resides in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and poverty rests in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled utility shutoff lies in the bottom 9.7% nationally, and housing insecurity lands in the bottom 10.4% nationally. Set against that, distance to a Superfund site sits at the national minimum.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 03049, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Manchester-Nashua, NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 13.1; chronic-disease standing 83.4 — 70 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,414 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.5%23.4–27.6
High blood pressure among adults31.1%28.7–33.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.6–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Depression among adults19.8%17.5–22.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%32.4–37.7
Obesity among adults30.5%26.6–34.4
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.3%7.7–11.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%5.1–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%75.3–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%76.0–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults89.6%88.2–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.8%67.2–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.4%67.5–73.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.8%77.0–86.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%13.2–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.1%7.9–10.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%18.2–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%30.1–38.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.2%11.7–14.9
Frequent mental distress among adults13.8%12.3–15.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Any disability among adults23.8%21.4–26.4
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Independent living disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Mobility disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.3–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.9–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.1–9.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.1–6.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.3–8.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
Loneliness among adults32.1%28.9–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle5.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription93.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate71.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population20.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households50.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+20.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age42.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$107,540$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$436,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$2,037$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured