Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06611

in Trumbull, ConnecticutPopulation 37,281

69.40/ 100

Ranked #698 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.2%)

Ranked #27 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (top 9.8%)

Ranked #21 of 46 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$163,073

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

22.9%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.8%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

99.1%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

99.1%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

11.7%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.7%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Trumbull, Connecticut (ZIP 06611) lands in the top 2.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (698th) and the top 9.8% of Connecticut (27th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled expected annual loss is at the national minimum, and household income settles in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled obesity resides in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and cognitive disability registers in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally, mobility disability stands in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and transportation lies in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Set against that, PFOA in drinking water sits in the top 4.1% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water is in the top 4.5% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 06468, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 29.6; chronic-disease standing 89.4 — 60 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,387 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.9%20.8–25.1
High blood pressure among adults29.1%26.5–31.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.0–10.6
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Depression among adults17.3%15.2–19.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.0%7.0–9.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%36.3–42.4
Obesity among adults22.9%19.4–26.6
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.5%4.5–6.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.7–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.6–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%77.1–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults92.0%90.9–92.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.0%71.0–77.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults79.4%77.4–81.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%75.5–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.9–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.6%6.5–8.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.9%17.5–22.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%27.8–35.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.7%10.4–13.3
Frequent mental distress among adults12.8%11.5–14.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Any disability among adults20.0%17.9–22.3
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Independent living disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.9
Mobility disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.9
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.3–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%20.0–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.1–9.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Loneliness among adults31.3%28.1–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–644.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)60.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription93.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate89.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population16.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households43.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+18.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$163,073$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$547,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$2,266$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 0.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.52 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured