How the Manchester-Nashua, NH metro's ZIP codes measure up on health
The ZipVitals Score across the Manchester-Nashua, NH metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.
Data release 202634 of 34 ZIP codes scored · 0.43M residents represented
Score snapshot
People & national context
The Manchester-Nashua, NH metro's ZIP codes, ranked
Highest-scoring
Top 34 of 34- 1,25803110in Bedford · 23,746 residents67.12
- 1,36203033in Brookline · 5,736 residents66.75
- 1,37403031in Amherst · 11,849 residents66.70
- 1,77303049in Hollis · 8,603 residents65.60
- 2,16103458in Peterborough · 6,872 residents64.60
- 2,23403449in Hancock · 1,838 residents64.43
- 2,37103062in Nashua · 29,441 residents64.14
- 2,67903054in Merrimack · 28,176 residents63.58
- 2,87403057in Mont Vernon · 2,709 residents63.18
- 3,16003052in Litchfield · 8,499 residents62.64
- 3,31303281in Weare · 9,170 residents62.37
- 3,49903063in Nashua · 15,805 residents62.05
- 3,64203070in New Boston · 6,177 residents61.79
- 4,13803045in Goffstown · 14,080 residents60.98
- 4,23303076in Pelham · 14,449 residents60.84
- 4,36503086in Wilton · 4,258 residents60.64
- 4,38703109in Manchester · 9,929 residents60.62
- 4,81803055in Milford · 16,337 residents60.06
- 4,98903082in Lyndeborough · 1,531 residents59.83
- 5,02803051in Hudson · 25,557 residents59.76
- 5,11903084in Temple · 1,363 residents59.65
- 5,53503104in Manchester · 35,237 residents59.08
- 5,69903071in New Ipswich · 5,310 residents58.86
- 7,11403064in Nashua · 14,391 residents57.17
- 7,68203047in Greenfield · 1,730 residents56.57
- 7,76103043in Francestown · 1,398 residents56.50
- 8,70503442in Bennington · 1,588 residents55.63
- 9,27903244in Hillsborough · 8,156 residents55.15
- 9,52803440in Antrim · 2,661 residents54.92
- 9,69003101in Manchester · 3,201 residents54.80
- 10,17003102in Manchester · 33,959 residents54.42
- 10,28603048in Greenville · 3,237 residents54.32
- 10,91503060in Nashua · 31,657 residents53.83
- 17,22803103in Manchester · 37,775 residents49.31
Lowest-scoring
Bottom 34 of 34- 17,22803103in Manchester · 37,775 residents49.31
- 10,91503060in Nashua · 31,657 residents53.83
- 10,28603048in Greenville · 3,237 residents54.32
- 10,17003102in Manchester · 33,959 residents54.42
- 9,69003101in Manchester · 3,201 residents54.80
- 9,52803440in Antrim · 2,661 residents54.92
- 9,27903244in Hillsborough · 8,156 residents55.15
- 8,70503442in Bennington · 1,588 residents55.63
- 7,76103043in Francestown · 1,398 residents56.50
- 7,68203047in Greenfield · 1,730 residents56.57
- 7,11403064in Nashua · 14,391 residents57.17
- 5,69903071in New Ipswich · 5,310 residents58.86
- 5,53503104in Manchester · 35,237 residents59.08
- 5,11903084in Temple · 1,363 residents59.65
- 5,02803051in Hudson · 25,557 residents59.76
- 4,98903082in Lyndeborough · 1,531 residents59.83
- 4,81803055in Milford · 16,337 residents60.06
- 4,38703109in Manchester · 9,929 residents60.62
- 4,36503086in Wilton · 4,258 residents60.64
- 4,23303076in Pelham · 14,449 residents60.84
- 4,13803045in Goffstown · 14,080 residents60.98
- 3,64203070in New Boston · 6,177 residents61.79
- 3,49903063in Nashua · 15,805 residents62.05
- 3,31303281in Weare · 9,170 residents62.37
- 3,16003052in Litchfield · 8,499 residents62.64
- 2,87403057in Mont Vernon · 2,709 residents63.18
- 2,67903054in Merrimack · 28,176 residents63.58
- 2,37103062in Nashua · 29,441 residents64.14
- 2,23403449in Hancock · 1,838 residents64.43
- 2,16103458in Peterborough · 6,872 residents64.60
- 1,77303049in Hollis · 8,603 residents65.60
- 1,37403031in Amherst · 11,849 residents66.70
- 1,36203033in Brookline · 5,736 residents66.75
- 1,25803110in Bedford · 23,746 residents67.12
Where each domain sits inside this metro
The Score above is one number for the whole Manchester-Nashua, NH metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.
The highest-standing fifth
7 of 34 ZIPsShare of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.
Standing highest: 03048 Greenville03057 Mont Vernon03084 Temple
Each fifth is about 7 of this metro’s 34 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 426,425 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.
The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.
Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.
Why this matters
The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Manchester-Nashua, NH figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.
A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.