Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01810

in Andover, MassachusettsPopulation 35,648

69.22/ 100

Ranked #727 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.3%)

Ranked #51 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 9.7%)

Ranked #47 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$172,606

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

86.8%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.7%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.2%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.5%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

11.0%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.2%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.4%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.6%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Andover, Massachusetts (ZIP 01810), by its overall standing, sits in the top 2.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (727th) and the top 9.7% of Massachusetts (51st).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: household income resides in the top 2.1% nationally, modeled mammography rests in the top 0.08% nationally, and modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity sits in the bottom 3.3% nationally, obesity settles in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and transportation registers in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and utility shutoff lands in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability is in the bottom 3.6% nationally. By contrast, modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 5.8% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 01741, about 7.7 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 1.0%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.2 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $172,606 predicts 82.2 years — 2.0 years above.

    Ranked #960 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.2 ± 1.7 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.0 years — 3.1 years above them.

    Ranked #741 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 5.6 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 90.0 (top 10%) — 84 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,517 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.3%21.1–25.5
High blood pressure among adults29.1%26.4–31.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.5–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.6–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.4–5.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Depression among adults20.6%18.2–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%32.5–38.5
Obesity among adults24.7%21.1–28.4
Stroke among adults2.4%2.2–2.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.7%4.6–7.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years2.5%2.1–3.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%73.9–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.8%80.4–85.0
Cholesterol screening among adults92.3%91.2–93.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.9%68.4–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults79.2%76.9–81.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years86.8%82.9–90.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.6–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.3%6.2–8.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.9%14.6–19.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%28.8–36.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Frequent mental distress among adults12.6%11.2–13.9
Frequent physical distress among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.8
Any disability among adults20.7%18.3–23.1
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Independent living disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.5
Mobility disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Self-care disability among adults2.1%1.9–2.3
Vision disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.4–22.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.6–7.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Loneliness among adults28.8%25.6–32.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)2.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)75.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription97.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate79.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population15.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households47.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+16.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age43.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$172,606$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$855,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$2,201$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.2 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 84.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured