Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02071

in South Walpole, MassachusettsPopulation 2,089

65.99/ 100

Ranked #1,625 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.1%)

Ranked #107 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #95 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$213,885

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

2.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.5%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

24.4%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.1%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.7%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

6.4%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.1%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, South Walpole, Massachusetts (ZIP 02071) comes out in the top 5.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,625th) and the top 20% of Massachusetts (107th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: household income registers in the top 0.8% nationally, childcare stands in the top 0.3% nationally, and fatal road crashes lands at the national minimum. Modeled obesity is in the bottom 3.6% nationally, poverty resides at the national minimum, and modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and diabetes sits in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability settles in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Set against that, modeled binge drinking registers in the top 3.1% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, childcare runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 02056, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 36.8; chronic-disease standing 95.8 (top 10%) — 59 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,311 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.6%19.1–24.1
High blood pressure among adults24.4%21.4–27.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults3.9%3.3–4.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.8%3.0–4.8
Depression among adults24.9%21.9–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults6.4%5.3–7.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.9%29.0–34.8
Obesity among adults23.5%19.6–27.7
Stroke among adults2.0%1.7–2.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.9%4.7–7.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years2.8%2.0–3.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.2%66.7–73.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.6–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults91.0%89.4–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.5%64.8–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.0%69.3–74.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.6%77.6–86.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.1%18.3–24.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.9%6.4–11.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults13.1%10.3–16.4
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%29.1–36.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.4%8.4–12.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%13.6–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults9.6%8.1–11.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%9.7–14.2
Any disability among adults20.2%16.9–23.8
Hearing disability among adults4.3%3.7–5.0
Independent living disability among adults5.0%4.1–6.1
Mobility disability among adults7.1%5.7–8.8
Self-care disability among adults1.9%1.6–2.4
Vision disability among adults2.4%2.0–2.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.6%17.4–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.7%4.7–9.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%5.2–10.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.2–9.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%3.9–6.2
Loneliness among adults32.1%28.2–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.6–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)0.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)77.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription99.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)2.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate95.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population11.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households44.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+10.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age32.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$213,885$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$651,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.6 yr ± 1.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.38 years of 82.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured