ZIP code
01770
in Sherborn, MassachusettsPopulation 4,427
72.06/ 100
Ranked #268 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.9%)
Ranked #15 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 2.9%)
Ranked #15 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 5.4%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Median household income
$250,001
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
4.4%
in the bottom 0.09% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
4.9%
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
3.2%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
3.8%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Obesity
21.9%
in the bottom 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
9.6%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
27.3%
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
8.9%
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
4.5%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›The read
Sherborn, Massachusetts (ZIP 01770) ranks in the top 0.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (268th) and the top 2.9% of Massachusetts (15th).
A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: household income lands at the national maximum, and modeled food insecurity settles in the bottom 0.09% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity rests in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and utility shutoff lands in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled transportation settles in the bottom 1.0% nationally, obesity rests in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 1.9% nationally, cognitive disability rests in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and independent living disability lands in the bottom 1.0% nationally.
Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 02030, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 91%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 96%
16%
Preventive Care
in the top 1.0%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 99%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 85%
8%
Disability
healthier than 99%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 61%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 69%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 35%
14%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 86%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 91%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 82%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 95%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 90%
8%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 54%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 52%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 54%
5%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 80%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 87%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 62%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 87%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 96%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 87%
8%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 55%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 56%
5%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Heavy environment, light chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 35.2; chronic-disease standing 91.3 (top 10%) — 56 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #15,008 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
01702
Massachusettsshares a border
Score 51.41
Closest healthier
02030
Massachusettsshares a border
Score 73.51
Similar health profile
02476
Massachusetts100% similar profile
Score 70.23
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 24.7% | 22.4–27.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 27.6% | 25.1–30.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.2% | 9.2–11.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.0% | 9.8–12.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.6% | 4.0–5.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 3.6% | 2.9–4.5 |
| Depression among adults | 23.0% | 20.7–25.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 7.5% | 6.4–8.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 37.2% | 34.4–40.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 21.9% | 18.7–25.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.2% | 1.9–2.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 3.3% | 2.7–4.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 1.9% | 1.5–2.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 75.4% | 72.5–78.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.7% | 80.6–84.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 93.9% | 92.7–94.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 73.8% | 70.9–76.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 82.6% | 80.8–84.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 82.7% | 78.6–86.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.9% | 15.0–19.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 6.1% | 4.5–8.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 13.1% | 10.9–15.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 27.3% | 24.3–30.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 9.6% | 8.1–11.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 12.2% | 10.7–13.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 8.6% | 7.4–10.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 8.9% | 7.5–10.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 19.6% | 17.1–22.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.9% | 4.2–5.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 4.5% | 3.7–5.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 7.7% | 6.3–9.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.8% | 1.5–2.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.3% | 1.9–2.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 16.9% | 14.6–19.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 4.4% | 3.3–6.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 4.6% | 3.2–6.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 4.9% | 3.9–6.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 3.8% | 3.1–4.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 29.8% | 26.6–33.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 3.2% | 2.5–3.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 3.1% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 2.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 4.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 82.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 45.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 4.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.5% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522 |
| Broadband subscription | 98.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 94.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 25.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 30.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522 |
| Homeownership rate | 89.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522 |
| Foreign-born population | 11.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 8.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527 |
| Single-parent households | 45.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520 |
| Population 65+ | 16.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527 |
| Median age | 42.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524 |
| Median household income | $250,001 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505 |
| Median home value | $1,026,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508 |
| Median gross rent | $2,338 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 89.3 yr ± 2.68 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.68 years of 89.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured