Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02492

in Needham, MassachusettsPopulation 21,424

72.42/ 100

Ranked #225 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.8%)

Ranked #10 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 1.9%)

Ranked #10 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 3.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$226,645

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

5.1%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

87%

in the top 0.05% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.0%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

21.3%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

3.9%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.4%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

10.1%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Needham, Massachusetts (ZIP 02492), in overall standing, comes out in the top 0.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (225th) and the top 1.9% of Massachusetts (10th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: household income lands in the top 0.7% nationally, modeled food insecurity rests in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and modeled mammography settles in the top 0.05% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 0.7% nationally, obesity rests in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and transportation settles in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and fair or poor health rests in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Pulling the other way, PFOA in drinking water settles at the national maximum, and PFOS in drinking water lands at the national maximum.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 02030, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 85.5 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $226,645 predicts 83.3 years — 2.1 years above.

    Ranked #859 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 85.5 ± 1.7 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 82.8 years — 2.7 years above them.

    Ranked #1,034 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.2%23.8–28.8
High blood pressure among adults29.0%26.2–31.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.8–11.7
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Depression among adults21.2%18.7–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.8%6.8–9.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%33.9–40.2
Obesity among adults21.3%17.9–24.9
Stroke among adults2.4%2.2–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.1%3.3–5.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years2.3%1.8–2.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.5–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.9–85.6
Cholesterol screening among adults93.4%92.4–94.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.2%68.8–75.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults80.6%78.4–82.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years87.0%83.0–90.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.8–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.3%5.2–7.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults13.0%10.9–15.3
Short sleep duration among adults28.3%24.8–31.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.1%8.7–11.7
Frequent mental distress among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Frequent physical distress among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.5
Any disability among adults20.5%18.0–23.2
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Independent living disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Mobility disability among adults8.3%7.1–9.7
Self-care disability among adults2.0%1.7–2.2
Vision disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.4%16.0–20.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.1–6.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.3–6.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.1–6.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults3.9%3.3–4.5
Loneliness among adults29.3%25.9–32.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.4%2.9–4.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–640.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)1.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)85.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle7.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate89.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population12.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households45.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age43.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$226,645$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$1,218,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$2,070$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.5 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 85.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured