Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01908

in Nahant, MassachusettsPopulation 3,325

63.01/ 100

Ranked #2,967 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.3%)

Ranked #184 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #147 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

86%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

9.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

78.1%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

67%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.2%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.6%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Nahant, Massachusetts (ZIP 01908) lands in the top 9.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,967th) and the top 35% of Massachusetts (184th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled mammography sits in the top 0.3% nationally, transit lands in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled colon screening lies in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity stands in the bottom 3.3% nationally, modeled food insecurity rests in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and elder services registers in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled transportation resides in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and loneliness settles in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Recreation is in the top 5.9% nationally. Set against that, floodplain exposure sits in the top 1.9% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". On the overall standing, ZIP 01907, about 0.9 miles away, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.9–33.9
High blood pressure among adults36.2%32.8–39.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.6%11.4–13.9
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.1–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%4.9–8.1
Depression among adults21.7%19.2–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%8.7–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%36.9–43.3
Obesity among adults27.5%23.2–31.5
Stroke among adults3.4%2.8–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.5%8.6–12.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years2.7%2.0–3.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.6–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.0%82.8–87.0
Cholesterol screening among adults93.3%92.0–94.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years78.1%75.0–81.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults79.8%77.5–82.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years86.0%81.9–89.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%12.2–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.9%6.4–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%15.8–23.9
Short sleep duration among adults30.9%27.1–34.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.6%11.0–16.7
Frequent mental distress among adults12.8%11.0–14.7
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.2–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%8.7–12.8
Any disability among adults25.8%21.8–30.1
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.2–8.3
Independent living disability among adults6.2%4.9–7.6
Mobility disability among adults12.0%9.5–14.7
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.2–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.4%2.8–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.6%15.9–21.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.3–9.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.2%5.9–10.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.2%4.9–7.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.8–5.8
Loneliness among adults27.6%24.4–31.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.6–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)1.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)61.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription95.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate78.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population6.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households73.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+36.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age60.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$112,762$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$748,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,777$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.3 yr ± 1.5178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.51 years of 82.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured