Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01902

in Lynn, MassachusettsPopulation 50,066

46.62/ 100

Ranked #20,618 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #494 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 6.3%)

Ranked #273 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 2.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

270 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

50.5%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

16.4%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

587 units

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

20.3%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

36.9%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

9.5%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.4%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

22.4%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 01902, one of several in Lynn, Massachusetts, by its composite score, sits in the bottom 36% nationally (20,618th) and the bottom 6.3% of Massachusetts (494th).

continue reading

The measures that matter most for this area lead the way: housing-cost burden lies in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled transportation noise rests in the top 3.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides in the top 4.4% nationally, and homeownership is in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Crowded housing lands in the top 5.0% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise stands in the top 5.6% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity registers in the top 6.2% nationally. On the better side, walkability settles in the top 1.1% nationally, subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 3.7% nationally, and fatal road crashes lies in the bottom 4.5% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 01904, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.0 ± 1.3 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.4 years — 3.5 years below them.

    Ranked #2,700 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.1%21.0–25.1
High blood pressure among adults32.7%30.0–35.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.8–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.9–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.1
Depression among adults21.7%19.2–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.5–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.7%30.9–36.5
Obesity among adults34.9%30.5–39.3
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.7%18.3–25.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.5%11.8–15.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.3%70.6–75.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%75.7–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.7–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.5%56.6–64.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.0%54.8–61.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.5%75.4–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.4–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.3%13.5–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.3%30.8–37.6
Short sleep duration among adults41.1%36.9–45.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.6%23.2–27.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%16.2–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.4–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.0%17.2–20.7
Any disability among adults34.8%31.6–37.7
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.6–11.6
Mobility disability among adults16.0%14.3–17.5
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.6
Vision disability among adults7.7%7.1–8.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.4%26.3–32.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.2%25.6–31.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults29.9%27.1–32.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.4%20.1–24.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.9–16.0
Loneliness among adults36.4%32.9–40.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.6–15.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–645.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)24.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle20.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)50.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate36.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population42.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households31.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+12.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age35.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$67,046$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$478,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,673$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.66 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured