Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02047

in Humarock, MassachusettsPopulation 182

63.86/ 100

Ranked #2,530 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.9%)

Ranked #156 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #136 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

94.9%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

86.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

78.7%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.2%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.3%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Humarock, Massachusetts (ZIP 02047) lands in the top 7.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,530th) and the top 30% of Massachusetts (156th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled mammography resides in the top 0.2% nationally, colon screening settles in the top 0.5% nationally, and food insecurity is in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Modeled transportation noise sits at the national minimum, poverty lands at the national minimum, and homeownership lies at the national maximum. Modeled transportation stands in the bottom 2.6% nationally. On the other side, floodplain exposure rests in the top 0.5% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water registers at the national maximum. PFOS in drinking water resides at the national maximum.

Against the wider neighborhood, floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". On the overall standing, ZIP 02066, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.6%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.8%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%27.4–33.7
High blood pressure among adults34.3%30.7–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.8%11.5–14.3
Current asthma among adults11.3%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%5.7–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%4.6–7.9
Depression among adults22.3%19.3–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.4–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%38.3–45.3
Obesity among adults26.2%21.8–30.4
Stroke among adults3.2%2.7–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.4–14.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years2.7%1.8–4.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%77.9–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.5%82.0–86.6
Cholesterol screening among adults93.1%91.5–94.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years78.7%75.8–82.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults80.3%78.2–82.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years86.5%82.8–90.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.9–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.6%6.2–11.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.9%13.3–20.8
Short sleep duration among adults28.5%25.2–32.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.0%10.4–16.1
Frequent mental distress among adults13.7%11.8–15.8
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%9.9–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.7%8.8–12.9
Any disability among adults27.3%23.0–31.6
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.2–8.4
Independent living disability among adults5.7%4.5–7.0
Mobility disability among adults11.3%9.0–14.0
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.1–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.5–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%16.3–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.2%4.3–8.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%4.6–9.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.1%4.6–7.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.4–5.3
Loneliness among adults29.7%26.1–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.0–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households65.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+43.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age41.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$106,333$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$682,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.1 yr ± 1.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.84 years of 85.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured