ZIP code
01330
in Ashfield, MassachusettsPopulation 1,704
63.01/ 100
Ranked #2,968 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.3%)
Ranked #185 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 35%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
85.5%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST82ndUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Obesity
24.5%
in the bottom 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST26thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
7.0%
in the bottom 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST17thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
76%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST87thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
6.5%
in the bottom 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST16thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Outpatient-care access
0.67 per 1,000 residents
in the top 4.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Child-care access
0.67 per 1,000 residents
in the top 5.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST90thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
77.7%
in the top 5.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
4.9%
in the bottom 6.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST18thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Civic-institution access
0.67 per 1,000 residents
in the top 8.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›The read
Ashfield, Massachusetts (ZIP 01330), by its composite score, sits in the top 9.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,968th) and the top 35% of Massachusetts (185th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled mammography is in the top 0.4% nationally, and obesity lands in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Modeled food insecurity stands in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and colon screening registers in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity settles in the bottom 4.4% nationally, outpatient sits in the top 4.4% nationally, and childcare lies in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled tree cover rests in the top 5.8% nationally, modeled transportation resides in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and civic is in the top 8.2% nationally.
For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 01032, just across the boundary. Modeled colon screening is in the top 1.8% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 84%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.5%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 92%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 75%
8%
Disability
healthier than 84%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 96%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 55%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 57%
16%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 27%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 94%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 91%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 76%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 76%
8%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.5%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 50%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 19%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 32%
16%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 2%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
01026
Massachusettsshares a border
Score 61.14
Closest healthier
01032
Massachusettsshares a border
Score 64.21
Similar health profile
01258
Massachusetts99% similar profile
Score 63.00
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 33.4% | 29.5–37.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 37.5% | 33.1–41.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 12.8% | 11.5–14.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.3% | 10.0–12.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.3% | 6.3–8.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.8% | 5.4–8.5 |
| Depression among adults | 23.6% | 20.1–27.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.5% | 8.7–12.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 40.2% | 35.9–44.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 24.5% | 19.0–30.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.5% | 2.9–4.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 7.6% | 6.0–9.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 3.2% | 2.3–4.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.0% | 76.8–83.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 84.2% | 81.4–86.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 93.0% | 91.8–94.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 76.0% | 71.8–80.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 77.0% | 74.2–79.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 85.5% | 80.2–89.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.4% | 12.8–18.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 9.8% | 7.3–12.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 18.3% | 14.3–23.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 31.2% | 26.1–36.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 14.3% | 11.5–17.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.5% | 11.6–15.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.5% | 10.5–14.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.1% | 9.2–13.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 26.5% | 22.1–31.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.4% | 6.3–8.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.1% | 5.0–7.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 12.3% | 9.9–15.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.9% | 2.4–3.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.4% | 2.9–4.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.8% | 16.4–23.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.0% | 5.2–9.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 6.2–11.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 6.5% | 5.0–8.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 4.9% | 4.0–5.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 30.4% | 25.5–35.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.7% | 3.7–5.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 10.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 3.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 2.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 2.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 4.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 50.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 45.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 4.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522 |
| Broadband subscription | 90.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 94.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 35.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 30.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522 |
| Homeownership rate | 85.3% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522 |
| Foreign-born population | 4.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 8.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527 |
| Single-parent households | 76.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520 |
| Population 65+ | 32.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527 |
| Median age | 58.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524 |
| Median household income | $83,493 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505 |
| Median home value | $391,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508 |
| Median gross rent | $1,093 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 85.3 yr ± 2.06 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.06 years of 85.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured