Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01074

in South Barre, MassachusettsPopulation 368

49.64/ 100

Ranked #16,723 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #472 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 10.5%)

Ranked #95 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

24.8%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

73.3%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.2%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST40th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

9.6%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

13 mi

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

10 mi

in the top 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, South Barre, Massachusetts (ZIP 01074) places in the bottom 48% nationally (16,723rd) and the bottom 10.5% of Massachusetts (472nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: homeownership rests in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and modeled pfas resides in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled transportation noise is in the top 9.2% nationally. More encouragingly, housing-cost burden lands at the national minimum, poverty stands at the national minimum, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the top 2.1% nationally, and disaster risk sits in the bottom 4.2% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

Beside the areas that surround it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 01005, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.6%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.5%25.8–31.1
High blood pressure among adults33.7%30.6–36.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.4
Current asthma among adults13.4%12.0–14.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.3–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.0–9.3
Depression among adults28.8%25.7–31.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%8.9–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%32.2–38.3
Obesity among adults34.2%29.7–38.8
Stroke among adults3.3%2.8–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.2–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%3.9–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.7%71.8–77.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%78.2–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%86.4–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.6%60.6–68.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.9%64.9–70.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.2%78.3–87.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.8–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.2%11.9–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%21.2–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%30.8–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%15.9–23.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.0–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%12.8–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.0–20.0
Any disability among adults31.1%26.6–35.7
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.4–10.9
Mobility disability among adults13.7%11.1–16.3
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.1–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.8%21.6–28.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%11.6–18.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.2%14.1–22.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%9.8–14.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.2–10.4
Loneliness among adults35.7%32.2–39.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.9–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)16.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription81.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate24.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households32.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age51.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$79,583$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$962$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.4 yr ± 2.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.46 years of 84.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured