ZIP code
01068
in Oakham, MassachusettsPopulation 1,639
58.02/ 100
Ranked #6,378 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)
Ranked #341 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 35%)
Ranked #44 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (top 39%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Elder-services access
0.53 per 1,000 residents
in the top 2.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Mammography
84.1%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST56thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
73.6%
in the top 5.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST68thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
69.3%
in the top 9.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST88thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Child-care access
0.53 per 1,000 residents
in the top 9.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST85thUS90thDefinition & source ›
The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
14.1%
in the top 10.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS89thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Uninsured (under 65)
3.7%
in the bottom 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST47thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
7.1 mi
in the top 20% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS80thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
10.4 mi
in the top 24% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS76thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Distance to a community health center
7.9 mi
in the top 26% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS74thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.
Full methodology ›The read
Oakham, Massachusetts (ZIP 01068), by its composite score, sits in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,378th) and the bottom 35% of Massachusetts (341st), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: elder services lands in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled mammography stands in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled colon screening registers in the top 5.7% nationally, and tree cover settles in the top 9.5% nationally. Childcare sits in the top 9.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled uninsured rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally, homeownership resides in the top 14.4% nationally, and modeled food insecurity is in the bottom 14.8% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled arsenic lands in the top 10.9% nationally.
For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 01612, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 60%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 97%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 71%
11%
Disability
healthier than 83%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 97%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 50%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 58%
14%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 35%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 77%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 63%
13%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.2%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 48%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 24%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 27%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 35%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 33%
8%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.6%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 90%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 76%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 62%
11%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 56%
8%
Disability
healthier than 58%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 21%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 37%
16%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
01005
Massachusettsshares a border
Score 50.73
Closest healthier
01612
Massachusettsshares a border
Score 63.65
Similar health profile
16442
Pennsylvania98% similar profile
Score 54.71
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 29.8% | 26.9–32.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 34.7% | 31.5–37.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.1% | 9.1–11.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.3% | 11.0–13.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.3% | 5.3–7.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.5% | 5.2–8.1 |
| Depression among adults | 26.1% | 23.2–29.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.2% | 8.6–11.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 37.8% | 34.7–40.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 31.9% | 27.5–36.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.1% | 2.6–3.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.2% | 9.1–13.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 3.7% | 2.8–4.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.3% | 74.2–80.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.6% | 80.2–84.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 91.4% | 89.8–92.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 73.6% | 70.2–76.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 70.5% | 67.7–73.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 84.1% | 79.3–87.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 18.2% | 15.9–20.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 11.9% | 9.0–14.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 20.9% | 17.2–24.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.3% | 29.5–36.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.5% | 12.7–18.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.3% | 14.2–18.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.4% | 11.2–15.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 13.0% | 10.9–15.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 26.8% | 22.9–30.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.1% | 5.2–7.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.7% | 5.5–8.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.7% | 9.5–14.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.0% | 2.4–3.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.5% | 2.9–4.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.3% | 19.1–25.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.3% | 7.0–11.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.7% | 7.9–13.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.2% | 6.4–10.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.9% | 4.8–7.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.4% | 28.8–36.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.6% | 4.5–6.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 4.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 3.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 2.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 5.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 4.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 40.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 45.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 2.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523 |
| Households without a vehicle | 3.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522 |
| Broadband subscription | 92.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 94.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 19.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 30.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522 |
| Homeownership rate | 91.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.4% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 8.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527 |
| Single-parent households | 53.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520 |
| Population 65+ | 21.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527 |
| Median age | 49.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524 |
| Median household income | $102,000 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505 |
| Median home value | $420,100 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508 |
| Median gross rent | $1,174 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 82.3 yr ± 2.34 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.34 years of 82.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured