Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.

Data release 2026122 of 125 ZIP codes scored · 2.4M residents represented

Score snapshot

53.33Metro-wide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
53.07Median scoremiddle of 122 scored ZIPs
68.71Highest score96140 · Carnelian Bay
34.95Lowest score95824 · Sacramento
33.77Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#147Among 386 metrosby population-weighted average
51%Residents in below-average ZIPs1.2M of 2.4M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
1.1MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs45% of the metro
0.83MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs34% of the metro
0ZIPs in the national top 100

The Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 50 of 122
  1. 83096140in Carnelian Bay · 1,171 residents68.71
  2. 1,47196145in Tahoe City · 3,441 residents66.42
  3. 2,20195742in Rancho Cordova · 17,768 residents64.52
  4. 2,23296141in Homewood · 609 residents64.44
  5. 2,29995762in El Dorado Hills · 47,657 residents64.29
  6. 2,61895746in Granite Bay · 22,985 residents63.70
  7. 2,80496146in Olympic Valley · 1,154 residents63.31
  8. 2,83695630in Folsom · 79,484 residents63.24
  9. 2,84195765in Rocklin · 43,871 residents63.24
  10. 3,29995683in Sloughhouse · 6,515 residents62.39
  11. 3,65295747in Roseville · 83,902 residents61.78
  12. 3,97895672in Rescue · 5,764 residents61.24
  13. 4,11795831in Sacramento · 43,545 residents61.01
  14. 4,18296148in Tahoe Vista · 562 residents60.92
  15. 4,21795818in Sacramento · 22,581 residents60.86
  16. 4,40095735in Twin Bridges · 51 residents60.61
  17. 4,51895819in Sacramento · 19,737 residents60.45
  18. 4,57295835in Sacramento · 42,004 residents60.37
  19. 4,65895816in Sacramento · 19,225 residents60.27
  20. 5,13395612in Clarksburg · 1,865 residents59.62
  21. 5,13795650in Loomis · 13,405 residents59.62
  22. 5,36495618in Davis · 26,267 residents59.30
  23. 5,42695722in Meadow Vista · 4,092 residents59.22
  24. 5,71595682in Shingle Springs · 30,065 residents58.84
  25. 5,83495757in Elk Grove · 56,764 residents58.69
  26. 5,89295661in Roseville · 32,589 residents58.61
  27. 5,93195864in Sacramento · 25,500 residents58.57
  28. 6,03695658in Newcastle · 5,894 residents58.45
  29. 6,07295664in Pilot Hill · 1,341 residents58.40
  30. 6,13295736in Weimar · 331 residents58.33
  31. 6,14095830in Sacramento · 695 residents58.31
  32. 6,14595758in Elk Grove · 65,725 residents58.31
  33. 6,28795614in Cool · 3,954 residents58.14
  34. 6,29795728in Soda Springs · 516 residents58.12
  35. 6,40695636in Grizzly Flats · 1,410 residents57.99
  36. 6,59395663in Penryn · 3,090 residents57.77
  37. 6,95595628in Fair Oaks · 44,855 residents57.33
  38. 6,98295720in Kyburz · 29 residents57.30
  39. 7,02695694in Winters · 10,759 residents57.24
  40. 7,24295678in Roseville · 45,346 residents57.03
  41. 7,40695648in Lincoln · 57,459 residents56.86
  42. 7,56995677in Rocklin · 29,206 residents56.68
  43. 7,57595655in Mather · 4,901 residents56.67
  44. 7,99295602in Auburn · 19,701 residents56.28
  45. 8,00695681in Sheridan · 1,267 residents56.26
  46. 8,31796150in South Lake Tahoe · 29,646 residents55.97
  47. 8,69895624in Elk Grove · 67,630 residents55.64
  48. 8,85395693in Wilton · 7,961 residents55.51
  49. 9,35795703in Applegate · 2,589 residents55.08
  50. 9,72795834in Sacramento · 36,245 residents54.78
Open the full Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro ranking →One page, all 122 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

Where each domain sits inside this metro

The Score above is one number for the whole Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.

The highest-standing fifth

25 of 122 ZIPs

Share of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.

Healthcare Access39%939,000 people

13 ZIP codes share this standing see them in the full ranking →

Chronic Disease Burden30%721,730 people

Standing highest: 95616 Davis95736 Weimar95742 Rancho Cordova

Disability26%634,259 people

Standing highest: 95742 Rancho Cordova96140 Carnelian Bay96145 Tahoe City

Mental Health26%620,879 people

Standing highest: 95735 Twin Bridges95746 Granite Bay96140 Carnelian Bay

Risk Behavior24%579,504 people

Standing highest: 95683 Sloughhouse96140 Carnelian Bay96141 Homewood

Social Need / SDOH23%550,942 people

Standing highest: 95661 Roseville95814 Sacramento95816 Sacramento

Preventive Care10%241,558 people

Standing highest: 95683 Sloughhouse95720 Kyburz96141 Homewood

Climate / Disaster Risk5%125,181 people

Standing highest: 96141 Homewood96146 Olympic Valley96148 Tahoe Vista

Environmental Hazard4%108,596 people

Standing highest: 95615 Courtland95641 Isleton95690 Walnut Grove

Each fifth is about 25 of this metro’s 122 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 2,430,797 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.

The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.

Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.