ZIP code
95736
in Weimar, CaliforniaPopulation 331
58.33/ 100
Ranked #6,132 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)
Ranked #596 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 35%)
Ranked #30 of 122 Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA ZIPs (top 25%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Median household income
$190,670
in the top 1.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
27%
in the bottom 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
5.2%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
84.3%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
22.4%
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
21.2%
in the top 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
3.5%
in the bottom 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Obesity
24.3%
in the bottom 4.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST23rdUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›The read
Weimar, California (ZIP 95736), by its overall standing, sits in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,132nd) and the top 35% of California (596th).
The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: household income lands in the top 1.3% nationally, modeled high cholesterol is in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure resides in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Poverty rests at the national minimum, modeled coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and modeled obesity sits in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Set against that, homeownership settles at the national minimum, and modeled fine-particle registers in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled pfas stands in the top 1.2% nationally, and binge drinking lands in the top 2.9% nationally.
Held up against its neighbors, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 95722, about 0.7 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 66%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 75%
11%
Disability
healthier than 89%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 71%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 42%
8%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
in the bottom 1.0%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 12%
13%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 18%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 96%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 61%
16%
Disability
healthier than 85%
7%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 54%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 52%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 6%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 32%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 32%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 12%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.00%
21%
Disability
healthier than 92%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 80%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 47%
16%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
in the bottom 0.9%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 20%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 37%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 36%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 13%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
95703
Californiashares a border
Score 55.08
Closest healthier
95722
Californiaabout 0.7 mi away
Score 59.22
Similar health profile
55402
Minnesota97% similar profile
Score 59.29
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 14.2% | 12.3–16.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 22.4% | 19.6–25.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 4.4% | 3.9–5.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.8% | 8.6–11.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 3.5% | 2.9–4.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 3.5% | 2.8–4.4 |
| Depression among adults | 21.6% | 18.3–25.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 6.6% | 5.5–7.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 27.0% | 23.8–30.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 24.3% | 19.3–30.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.9% | 1.6–2.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 7.9% | 6.2–10.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.4% | 4.7–8.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 61.5% | 58.0–64.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 66.8% | 62.1–71.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 77.8% | 73.6–81.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.8% | 59.7–69.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 67.7% | 64.3–70.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.7% | 71.8–84.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 21.2% | 17.6–25.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 8.2% | 6.3–10.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 16.7% | 13.3–20.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.3% | 27.8–39.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.1% | 12.2–18.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.8% | 15.8–21.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 10.3% | 8.6–12.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.4% | 12.4–18.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 25.6% | 21.0–30.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.1% | 3.5–4.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.6–8.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 7.9% | 6.5–9.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.4% | 2.0–2.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.7% | 3.1–4.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.1% | 23.6–33.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.7% | 9.7–16.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.5% | 7.3–12.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 8.5–12.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.4% | 6.8–10.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 39.2% | 33.9–45.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.3% | 4.4–6.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 23.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 33.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 78.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 33.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 0.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 38.7% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 4.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 37.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | $190,670 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | $2,262 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.1 yr ± 2.50 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.50 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured