Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95830

in Sacramento, CaliforniaPopulation 695

58.31/ 100

Ranked #6,140 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #597 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #31 of 122 Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

48.6 per million

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$135,938

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

83.2 days/year

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.3%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.9%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 95830, one of several in Sacramento, California, in overall standing, comes out in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,140th) and the top 35% of California (597th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: household income rests in the top 5.8% nationally, lead in tap water settles at the national minimum, and poverty lands in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Modeled obesity rests in the bottom 8.9% nationally. On the other hand, modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 1.2% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water lands at the national maximum. PFOS in drinking water rests at the national maximum, and modeled extreme heat settles in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands at the national minimum, and PFAS in drinking water rests at the national maximum.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 95742, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%22.5–28.1
High blood pressure among adults33.3%29.9–36.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.6–6.2
Depression among adults20.1%17.5–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.4–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%33.9–41.0
Obesity among adults26.9%22.7–31.4
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.6%6.1–9.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.9–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%72.4–78.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.1%69.8–76.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.6–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%60.6–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.8%65.9–71.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%67.5–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.6–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.6%8.1–11.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.2%16.1–22.3
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%30.4–38.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%17.2–22.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.3–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.2%10.7–13.8
Any disability among adults29.0%25.4–32.5
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.5
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.2–8.0
Mobility disability among adults13.9%11.9–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.7%23.3–30.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.7–13.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.4–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.6–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.0–7.8
Loneliness among adults36.3%32.0–40.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)22.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)49.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)7.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle9.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription93.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate90.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population17.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households54.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+24.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age38.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$135,938$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$952,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured