Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

Archived release. This page is frozen at the data release below and will not change. Current data is at the latest ranking.

Bakersfield-Delano, CA metro ZIP codes, ranked by the ZipVitals Score

Every Bakersfield-Delano, CA metro ZIP code (ZCTA) with a ZipVitals Score, ranked within the metro — descriptive of documented conditions, never a verdict on the people who live there.

Data release 202648 ZIP codes in this ranking

Download the data (CSV)How the ZipVitals Score works
48 of 48 shown
#ZIP code · locatorScore
  1. 5,37593531in Keene · 515 residents59.29
  2. 7,53993311in Bakersfield · 55,555 residents56.72
  3. 7,76893524in Edwards · 57 residents56.50
  4. 10,23693312in Bakersfield · 58,384 residents54.37
  5. 10,35693561in Tehachapi · 31,175 residents54.27
  6. 10,56993314in Bakersfield · 35,407 residents54.10
  7. 11,43993222in Pine Mountain Club · 2,721 residents53.46
  8. 14,75293527in Inyokern · 1,831 residents51.07
  9. 15,32893555in Ridgecrest · 33,845 residents50.66
  10. 18,45093313in Bakersfield · 61,843 residents48.38
  11. 22,71093518in Caliente · 1,205 residents44.71
  12. 23,82793523in Edwards · 3,502 residents43.58
  13. 23,85593560in Rosamond · 22,119 residents43.55
  14. 25,01493225in Frazier Park · 4,663 residents42.24
  15. 25,25293309in Bakersfield · 63,217 residents41.95
  16. 25,81693243in Lebec · 834 residents41.28
  17. 25,92693220in Edison · 0 residents41.13
  18. 26,42993238in Kernville · 887 residents40.47
  19. 26,92893306in Bakersfield · 74,116 residents39.73
  20. 27,13893255in Onyx · 470 residents39.40
  21. 27,27293226in Glennville · 58 residents39.19
  22. 27,59093308in Bakersfield · 55,078 residents38.71
  23. 27,83093287in Woody · 98 residents38.32
  24. 28,23493268in Taft · 16,963 residents37.61
  25. 28,33093263in Shafter · 24,024 residents37.42
  26. 28,42993215in Delano · 54,556 residents37.21
  27. 28,69493285in Wofford Heights · 2,920 residents36.63
  28. 29,01693505in California City · 14,353 residents35.96
  29. 29,10393280in Wasco · 27,407 residents35.71
  30. 29,20493251in Mc Kittrick · 274 residents35.47
  31. 29,31293249in Lost Hills · 2,243 residents35.21
  32. 29,32393283in Weldon · 2,326 residents35.17
  33. 29,38693516in Boron · 2,889 residents35.03
  34. 29,72593224in Fellows · 414 residents34.03
  35. 29,73193501in Mojave · 6,435 residents34.01
  36. 29,93593205in Bodfish · 1,708 residents33.38
  37. 30,02993206in Buttonwillow · 1,898 residents33.06
  38. 30,03993301in Bakersfield · 13,620 residents33.03
  39. 30,11993276in Tupman · 157 residents32.70
  40. 30,59293304in Bakersfield · 51,037 residents30.78
  41. 30,66893250in McFarland · 15,599 residents30.48
  42. 30,76893203in Arvin · 20,712 residents29.99
  43. 30,86893519in Cantil · 19 residents29.47
  44. 30,92293307in Bakersfield · 85,945 residents29.10
  45. 31,00493528in Johannesburg · 86 residents28.69
  46. 31,34793305in Bakersfield · 37,714 residents26.09
  47. 31,77293240in Lake Isabella · 5,981 residents21.56
  48. 31,77593241in Lamont · 15,250 residents21.50

Don’t see a ZIP code you expected? Not every ZIP carries a Score — 1 of this metro's 49 don’t have enough measured data across the nine health domains, and PO-box-only ZIPs aren’t mapped areas. Any ZIP’s own page explains its standing. Look up any ZIP code →

How this ranking works

Ranks are each ZIP code’s position in the full national ZipVitals Score ranking, so the numbers jump — this metro holds 48 of the tens of thousands of scored US ZIP codes — and they never change with the sort direction; the rank a ZIP carries here is the rank it carries everywhere on this site. A ZIP whose data is too thin to score is held out entirely rather than filled from county or metro figures.

Cite this ranking

The permalink /metro/bakersfield-delano-ca/ranking/2026-75251315 resolves to this exact release and never changes; an always-latest version lives at /metro/bakersfield-delano-ca/ranking. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions — never a claim about residents. Where ZIP codes score low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.