Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

93313

in Bakersfield, CaliforniaPopulation 61,843

48.38/ 100

Ranked #18,452 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #1,176 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #10 of 48 Bakersfield-Delano, CA ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

121.7 days/year

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

4.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54.6%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST20th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

39.9 per million

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

95.2%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.1%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.9%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.6%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

139.3 days/year

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 93313, one of several in Bakersfield, California, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 42% nationally (18,452nd) and the bottom 32% of California (1,176th).

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: modeled extreme heat lands in the top 0.7% nationally, fine-particle resides in the top 1.3% nationally, and colon screening lies in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 6.5% nationally, PFOS in drinking water stands in the top 6.6% nationally, and crowded housing is in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the top 7.6% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled high cholesterol sits in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and hearing disability registers in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lands in the bottom 6.1% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 93311, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bakersfield-Delano, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.5 ± 0.8 years. A median household income of $91,943 predicts 79.7 years — 1.3 years below.

    Ranked #1,602 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 6.1 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 92.8 (top 10%) — 87 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,669 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.9 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 78.5 ± 0.8 years.

    Ranked #1,408 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.7%15.6–19.8
High blood pressure among adults28.0%24.9–31.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.5%4.0–4.9
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.2–5.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Depression among adults20.9%18.1–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.1%27.8–34.6
Obesity among adults32.2%27.1–37.5
Stroke among adults2.7%2.6–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.2–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%12.3–15.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure66.2%62.9–69.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.3%66.5–74.0
Cholesterol screening among adults82.6%80.7–84.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.6%49.8–59.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.5%55.1–62.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.4%67.5–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.3–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%10.5–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.1%24.6–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%33.6–43.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.4%20.9–25.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.7–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.2–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%15.0–18.4
Any disability among adults31.8%28.3–35.4
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.7–9.3
Mobility disability among adults13.7%12.2–15.2
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.3
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.8–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.9%27.3–34.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.4%19.8–25.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.3%17.2–21.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.0%16.7–21.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.2–12.7
Loneliness among adults37.6%33.1–42.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.4–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6411.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)19.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription96.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate78.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population24.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households34.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+8.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age31.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$91,943$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$371,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,914$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 0.4178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.41 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured