Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

93518

in Caliente, CaliforniaPopulation 1,205

44.70/ 100

Ranked #22,718 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #1,327 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #11 of 48 Bakersfield-Delano, CA ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

66.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.88 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.4%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.88 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.0%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.3%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.13%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.2%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

21.7%

in the top 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

Caliente, California (ZIP 93518), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 29% nationally (22,718th) and the bottom 23% of California (1,327th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: childcare lies in the top 3.1% nationally, civic sits in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled pfas settles in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Set against that, fatal road crashes stands in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled fine-particle lands in the top 3.4% nationally. Slow internet speeds is in the top 5.9% nationally, and walkability resides in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the top 8.3% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 93531, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bakersfield-Delano, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.0–38.3
High blood pressure among adults44.0%39.8–48.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.8%10.7–13.0
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%8.6–11.9
Depression among adults23.7%20.4–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.3%14.0–18.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.4%38.2–46.6
Obesity among adults34.7%29.0–40.5
Stroke among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.3%16.0–23.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.8–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%75.9–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.1–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.5–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.5%57.8–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.7%52.2–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%64.7–78.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.3–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.2%12.3–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.9%23.2–32.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%31.5–41.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.4%21.7–28.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.5%15.2–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%12.9–17.0
Any disability among adults38.1%33.2–42.5
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.6–11.5
Mobility disability among adults21.7%18.6–24.6
Self-care disability among adults5.6%4.8–6.3
Vision disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.0–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.5–17.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.2–20.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.5–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.1–9.4
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.5–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6417.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription84.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate93.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population5.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households57.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+30.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age51.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$62,321$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$285,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,392$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.9 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 71.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured