Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29842

in Beech Island, South CarolinaPopulation 8,102

45.39/ 100

Ranked #22,003 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #240 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #23 of 43 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

69.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.01%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

34.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

20 days/year

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Park land

1.4%

in the top 30% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US70th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Beech Island, South Carolina (ZIP 29842) lands in the bottom 31% nationally (22,003rd) and the bottom 42% of South Carolina (240th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Against that, distance to a Superfund site rests at the national minimum, modeled pfas is in the top 4.7% nationally, and modeled nitrate stands in the top 8.5% nationally. Fatal road crashes settles in the top 9.9% nationally, modeled humid heat lies in the top 11.0% nationally, and households without a vehicle resides in the top 12.1% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 14.3% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity registers in the top 14.9% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 29803, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%27.2–32.2
High blood pressure among adults40.6%37.7–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Depression among adults23.5%20.8–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%14.0–17.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%34.2–40.2
Obesity among adults37.5%33.3–42.0
Stroke among adults4.6%4.3–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.3%13.5–19.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.3%12.5–16.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%79.2–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.4–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.7–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.8%63.6–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.7%53.4–59.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%71.1–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.9–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%14.6–18.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%27.4–34.1
Short sleep duration among adults39.9%35.6–43.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.4%22.0–27.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.7–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%14.2–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.6–18.0
Any disability among adults33.7%30.6–37.1
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Mobility disability among adults17.8%16.0–19.8
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.9
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.4–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.4%24.2–30.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.3%19.5–24.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.4–16.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.7–18.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.4–12.0
Loneliness among adults33.4%29.8–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6412.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)18.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle11.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate75.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population7.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households43.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+19.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$57,949$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$126,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$738$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.6 yr ± 1.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.50 years of 76.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured