Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99573

in Copper Center, AlaskaPopulation 941

45.01/ 100

Ranked #22,390 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #79 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

10.0%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.053 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST14th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

46.5 mi

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.1%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST73rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

3.7%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

10.4%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

65.4 mi

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST28th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.6%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

92.3%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Copper Center, Alaska (ZIP 99573) lands in the bottom 30% nationally (22,390th) and the top 37% of Alaska (79th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The readings that matter most locally set the tone for the profile: modeled energy burden is in the top 0.5% nationally, and walkability stands in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles in the top 0.8% nationally, and modeled mammography lies in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Slow internet speeds resides in the top 3.2% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 4.3% nationally. On the encouraging side, distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 7.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 11.0% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 99566, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

healthier than 95%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

9%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

22%

Disability

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.3%25.9–32.9
High blood pressure among adults38.8%34.5–43.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.2–10.0
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.4–9.8
Depression among adults20.8%17.6–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.0–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%32.5–41.5
Obesity among adults34.6%27.3–42.7
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.8%12.0–17.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%7.3–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.3%69.6–76.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.5%66.2–74.7
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%80.9–85.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.9%55.4–66.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.7%52.8–60.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.1%56.1–73.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%15.2–22.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.8%16.0–21.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.1%19.1–27.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.9%30.4–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%18.1–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.6–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.7–16.4
Any disability among adults32.3%28.1–37.3
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.1–17.6
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.3%20.9–28.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.4–17.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.0–12.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.8–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.2%8.1–10.5
Loneliness among adults31.9%27.2–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.1–9.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6419.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)7.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle8.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription92.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate85.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households65.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+22.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age45.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$78,558$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$298,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$925$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 1.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.28 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured