Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98951

in Wapato, WashingtonPopulation 12,581

41.77/ 100

Ranked #25,415 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #557 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 4.2%)

Ranked #16 of 21 Yakima, WA ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

24.4%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

4.1%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

53.3%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

60.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.9%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

32.4%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

9.2%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

9.6%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.3%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.7%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Wapato, Washington (ZIP 98951) stands in the bottom 21% nationally (25,415th) and the bottom 4.2% of Washington (557th).

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: modeled uninsured rests in the top 2.5% nationally, and fine-particle lands in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and fatal road crashes rests in the top 2.2% nationally. Modeled vision disability lands in the top 5.1% nationally, fair or poor health settles in the top 4.9% nationally, and nitrate rests in the top 3.2% nationally. Crowded housing lands in the top 5.0% nationally, modeled mammography settles in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability rests in the top 6.9% nationally.

For clarity, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. ZIP 98903, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Yakima, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.1 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $63,356 predicts 78.3 years — 2.2 years below.

    Ranked #2,975 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.1 ± 1.5 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.7 years — 4.6 years below them.

    Ranked #3,276 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.7%19.7–23.7
High blood pressure among adults32.9%30.2–35.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Depression among adults22.0%19.6–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.2%13.7–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%31.5–37.0
Obesity among adults42.4%38.1–46.8
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.9%17.7–24.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years24.4%21.5–27.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.5%66.6–72.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults66.6%63.4–70.0
Cholesterol screening among adults76.0%73.6–78.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.3%49.2–57.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.2%47.0–53.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.3%60.8–73.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.9–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%13.8–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.2%29.9–36.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.8%29.1–36.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.4%29.7–35.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.6–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.5%15.8–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.7%18.8–22.8
Any disability among adults38.2%35.0–41.6
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.5–9.1
Independent living disability among adults11.6%10.5–12.8
Mobility disability among adults17.6%16.0–19.4
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.6–6.6
Vision disability among adults9.9%9.0–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–6427.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)33.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)8.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle7.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription89.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate54.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population24.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households38.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+11.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age30.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$63,356$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$230,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$899$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured