Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98934

in Kittitas, WashingtonPopulation 775

55.18/ 100

Ranked #9,248 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #227 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

14.5%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.6%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

16.4%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.5%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.8%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.9%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Kittitas, Washington (ZIP 98934) places in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,248th) and the top 39% of Washington (227th).

continue reading

Where the data is kindest to this area, a few readings lead the way: modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and high blood pressure sits in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled diabetes rests in the bottom 7.6% nationally. On the other hand, modeled tree cover resides at the national minimum, modeled fine-particle is in the top 6.9% nationally, and households without a vehicle lands in the top 7.7% nationally. Modeled arsenic stands in the top 8.8% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 98946, about 11 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.4%22.7–28.1
High blood pressure among adults28.5%25.3–31.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.1
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.6–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.2–6.1
Depression among adults25.2%21.9–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.8%7.5–10.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.6%28.3–35.0
Obesity among adults34.7%29.1–40.3
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%12.1–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.3–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.0%65.6–72.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.8%65.1–72.4
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.0–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%62.1–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.9–67.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.4%67.6–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.9%16.0–22.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.5%8.2–12.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.4%15.0–22.1
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%26.2–35.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%12.9–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.7–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%10.9–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.2–16.7
Any disability among adults27.3%23.3–31.5
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.2
Independent living disability among adults6.8%5.7–8.0
Mobility disability among adults10.6%8.9–12.6
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.5–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–648.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)13.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)8.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle14.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate75.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population7.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households54.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age54.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$79,063$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$319,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,432$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 1.3678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.36 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured