ZIP code
98007
in Bellevue, WashingtonPopulation 27,692
74.06/ 100
Ranked #89 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.3%)
Ranked #4 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 0.7%)
Ranked #4 of 166 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA ZIPs (top 2.5%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Obesity
18.2%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Dental provider access
2.3 per 1,000 residents
in the top 0.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
21.7%
in the bottom 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
5.4%
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Subsidized affordable housing
975 units
in the top 1.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
3.0%
in the bottom 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$1
in the top 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS98thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
5.9%
in the bottom 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Stroke
1.7%
in the bottom 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
3.7%
in the bottom 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›The read
ZIP 98007, one of several in Bellevue, Washington ranks in the top 0.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (89th) and the top 0.7% of Washington (4th).
Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled obesity rests in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and dental providers lands in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure settles in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 1.5% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and modeled diabetes rests in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and hearing disability settles in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Working the other way, modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 1.7% nationally.
Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 98004, about 1.3 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 99%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the top 1.0%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 99%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 90%
8%
Disability
in the top 0.4%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 95%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 88%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 53%
14%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 22%
13%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 96%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 96%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 92%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 98%
8%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 75%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 82%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 53%
14%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 39%
13%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 93%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 90%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 62%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 88%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 96%
8%
Disability
healthier than 92%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 61%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 74%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 42%
13%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Above what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 84.6 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $131,109 predicts 81.1 years — 3.5 years above.
Ranked #295 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Above its nearby ZIPs
The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors
Estimated life expectancy is 84.6 ± 1.7 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 82.0 years — 2.6 years above them.
Ranked #1,070 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
98005
Washingtonshares a border
Score 72.80
Closest healthier
98004
Washingtonabout 1.3 mi away
Score 74.67
Similar health profile
80016
Colorado99% similar profile
Score 66.19
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 14.6% | 13.7–15.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 21.7% | 20.4–23.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 5.1% | 4.8–5.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 8.3% | 7.7–9.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 3.0% | 2.8–3.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 2.4% | 2.2–2.7 |
| Depression among adults | 20.2% | 18.7–21.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 5.9% | 5.4–6.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 30.9% | 29.2–32.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 18.2% | 16.4–20.1 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.7% | 1.6–1.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 6.0% | 5.1–7.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.4% | 5.6–7.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 64.0% | 62.0–66.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 68.0% | 65.9–70.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 84.4% | 83.0–85.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.5% | 62.2–66.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 70.2% | 68.4–71.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.0% | 74.8–80.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.1% | 14.7–17.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 5.5% | 4.9–6.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 12.7% | 11.5–14.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 29.6% | 27.5–31.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 10.4% | 9.5–11.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.0% | 12.0–14.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 7.8% | 7.2–8.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 9.4% | 8.7–10.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 17.4% | 16.2–18.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 3.7% | 3.4–4.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 4.1% | 3.7–4.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 5.4% | 4.9–6.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.7% | 1.6–1.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.7% | 2.5–3.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 6.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 6.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 8.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 5.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 68.6% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 27.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 4.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584 |
| Households without a vehicle | 10.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580 |
| Broadband subscription | 95.9% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 92.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 32.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 28.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580 |
| Homeownership rate | 35.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 75.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 5.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580 |
| Foreign-born population | 55.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 6.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588 |
| Single-parent households | 46.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574 |
| Population 65+ | 10.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588 |
| Median age | 33.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584 |
| Median household income | $131,109 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547 |
| Median home value | $1,018,100 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542 |
| Median gross rent | $2,331 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 84.6 yr ± 0.89 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 84.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured