Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98303

in Anderson Island, WashingtonPopulation 1,448

49.65/ 100

Ranked #16,715 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #416 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #159 of 166 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA ZIPs (bottom 4.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Civic-institution access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.6%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.6%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.5%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96.6%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.06%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.0%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.7%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

56.3%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Anderson Island, Washington (ZIP 98303), overall, ranks in the bottom 48% nationally (16,715th) and the bottom 28% of Washington (416th).

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled high cholesterol resides in the top 1.9% nationally, hearing disability settles in the top 6.5% nationally, and high blood pressure is in the top 8.3% nationally. More encouragingly, civic sits in the top 1.9% nationally, fatal road crashes lands at the national minimum, and modeled colon screening lies in the top 3.7% nationally. Homeownership stands in the top 6.8% nationally. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and binge drinking resides in the bottom 6.8% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 98327, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 91.7 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 9.3 (bottom 10%) — 82 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #385 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults41.7%38.8–44.1
High blood pressure among adults46.7%43.8–49.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.7%12.4–15.0
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.2–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%8.8–11.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%7.7–11.3
Depression among adults26.5%24.1–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.5%14.5–18.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.6%44.1–49.0
Obesity among adults39.2%35.6–42.7
Stroke among adults5.1%4.4–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.3%6.1–8.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.1–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.9–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%76.9–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults89.7%88.4–90.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.6%72.0–76.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.6%66.3–70.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%69.0–77.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.0%10.6–13.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%10.2–15.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.2%18.8–25.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%31.6–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.4%18.4–24.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.1–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.9%15.6–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.7–16.7
Any disability among adults38.5%34.4–42.3
Hearing disability among adults11.5%10.1–12.8
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.7–10.5
Mobility disability among adults19.5%16.5–22.4
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.1–5.7
Vision disability among adults5.6%4.8–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)44.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate96.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population4.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households94.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+39.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age61.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$80,282$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$546,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 2.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.10 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured