Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98355

in Mineral, WashingtonPopulation 702

47.55/ 100

Ranked #19,495 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #474 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

5.7%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

88%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

22.1 mi

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

21.7 mi

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.9%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.6 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

11.2 days/year

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.7%

in the top 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Mineral, Washington (ZIP 98355) lands in the bottom 39% nationally (19,495th) and the bottom 18% of Washington (474th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: distance to a nursing home stands in the top 2.8% nationally, and modeled mammography lies in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lands in the top 4.7% nationally, and walkability sits in the bottom 5.5% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled pfas is in the bottom 1.7% nationally, modeled tree cover settles in the top 1.9% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 6.4% nationally, and humid heat rests in the bottom 8.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 98304, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.09%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.4%33.1–39.8
High blood pressure among adults41.9%38.2–45.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.9%10.7–13.1
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.1–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.7–10.8
Depression among adults25.9%22.7–29.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%12.5–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.3%39.7–47.2
Obesity among adults39.4%34.0–44.8
Stroke among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.7–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%6.6–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.4–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.2%68.7–75.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.9–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.0%67.0–74.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.4%58.2–64.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.9%59.4–73.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.8–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%12.3–17.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.2%19.4–27.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%31.2–40.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.0%18.8–25.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.7–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%15.2–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.2–17.3
Any disability among adults35.5%31.2–40.2
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
Independent living disability among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Mobility disability among adults17.4%14.8–20.3
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.6%4.8–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–6419.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)0.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)44.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle6.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription93.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate77.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households57.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+6.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age31.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$102,438$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$402,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 2.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.60 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured