Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

97882

in Umatilla, OregonPopulation 7,976

49.46/ 100

Ranked #16,989 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #194 of 407 Oregon ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

30%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17.5%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.1%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

16.7%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

40 days/year

in the top 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

3.1 mi

in the bottom 15% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Umatilla, Oregon (ZIP 97882), overall, ranks in the bottom 47% nationally (16,989th) and the top 48% of Oregon (194th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 3.4% nationally, mental-health providers rests in the top 8.8% nationally, and modeled energy burden registers in the bottom 10.3% nationally. Set against that, modeled tree cover resides at the national minimum, uninsured settles in the top 7.0% nationally, and fine-particle is in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled arsenic lies in the top 8.6% nationally, and extreme heat stands in the top 11.9% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 97838, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

in the bottom 1.0%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 1.0%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 22.2; chronic-disease standing 77.3 — 55 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,906 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.0%20.3–25.8
High blood pressure among adults30.1%26.5–33.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.4
Depression among adults21.9%18.7–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.3–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.0%26.4–33.8
Obesity among adults39.3%32.6–46.1
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.4–18.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.5%14.7–20.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure65.4%61.6–68.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.4%63.9–72.5
Cholesterol screening among adults77.3%74.5–79.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.0%51.8–62.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.9%54.0–61.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%68.8–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%15.2–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%13.4–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.9%21.8–30.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%28.3–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.4%21.4–27.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.6–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.4–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%16.1–20.2
Any disability among adults33.6%29.3–37.8
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.8–15.4
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.7% (4.7–26.4%) n=411
Uninsured 18–6416.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.9% (0.9–19.7%) n=411
No HS diploma (25+)18.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (1.2–16.6%) n=412
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.7% (11.1–49.6%) n=412
Unemployment rate (16+)6.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–10.0%) n=409
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–10.0%) n=410
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (76.7–96.9%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (14.6–42.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate71.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.5% (52.8–90.2%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–6.7%) n=410
Foreign-born population21.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.0% (0.0–13.0%) n=412
Single-parent households59.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.5% (43.5–77.1%) n=407
Population 65+10.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.5% (12.7–42.1%) n=412
Median age36.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.1 yr (36.3–62.2) n=410
Median household income$69,223$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,301 ($49,007–$109,558) n=378
Median home value$244,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$413,900 ($238,120–$653,360) n=374
Median gross rent$1,152$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,252 ($807–$1,772) n=327
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 2.3978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.1 yr (76.4–82.0) n=409

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.39 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured