Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99338

in Kennewick, WashingtonPopulation 20,633

60.58/ 100

Ranked #4,418 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.8%)

Ranked #102 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #2 of 15 Kennewick-Richland, WA ZIPs (top 13.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

9.4 µg/L

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.4%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.8%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.7%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.1%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

33.4 days/year

in the top 13.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

61.6%

in the top 14.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

25.3 days/year

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 99338, one of several in Kennewick, Washington ranks in the top 13.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,418th) and the top 18% of Washington (102nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: lithium in drinking water registers in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes is in the bottom 6.7% nationally, modeled energy burden registers in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Modeled short sleep is in the bottom 8.3% nationally, subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 10.6% nationally, and modeled mobility disability lies in the bottom 10.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled fine-particle is in the top 7.3% nationally, and tree cover registers in the bottom 10.1% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 99352, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.5 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $111,042 predicts 80.5 years — 2.0 years above.

    Ranked #921 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.2%22.0–26.7
High blood pressure among adults27.8%25.2–30.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.2–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.8%4.2–5.6
Depression among adults24.1%21.5–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%7.9–10.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%33.5–39.5
Obesity among adults34.0%30.1–38.5
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.4–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%6.0–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.2%67.1–73.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.4%69.5–75.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.2–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.5%64.9–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.2%67.5–72.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%68.9–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%15.2–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.9%7.5–10.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.7%14.2–19.4
Short sleep duration among adults29.7%26.3–33.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.0%13.0–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.5–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.7–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
Any disability among adults25.1%22.2–28.2
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Mobility disability among adults10.3%9.0–11.9
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–6410.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)6.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription95.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate81.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population9.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households48.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+16.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age37.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$111,042$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$551,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,486$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured