Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

80012

in Aurora, ColoradoPopulation 51,052

52.11/ 100

Ranked #13,303 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #308 of 502 Colorado ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #113 of 127 Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO ZIPs (bottom 11.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.4%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

46.4%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

140 intersections/sq mi

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

49.8%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.88 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 80012, one of several in Aurora, Colorado, by its composite score, sits in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,303rd) and the bottom 39% of Colorado (308th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled high cholesterol is in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Walkability stands in the top 5.6% nationally, and dental providers registers in the top 9.0% nationally. On the other side, modeled disaster risk settles in the top 2.4% nationally, housing-cost burden sits in the top 4.7% nationally, and modeled tree cover lies at the national minimum. PFAS in drinking water rests at the national maximum, modeled uninsured resides in the top 6.5% nationally, and homeownership is in the bottom 9.0% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 80013, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 26.2; chronic-disease standing 85.1 — 59 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,299 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.7%19.8–23.8
High blood pressure among adults29.7%27.2–32.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.1%5.6–6.6
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Depression among adults21.7%19.3–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%9.0–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.4%26.8–32.0
Obesity among adults30.0%26.2–33.9
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.1%11.6–16.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.0%15.9–20.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.6%66.8–72.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.7%65.7–71.7
Cholesterol screening among adults82.0%80.1–83.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.5%54.7–62.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.9%51.9–57.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.4%63.3–75.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.8–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.6%12.0–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%21.0–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%32.8–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.1%19.0–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.6–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.2–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%15.5–18.8
Any disability among adults31.0%28.1–34.1
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Mobility disability among adults12.2%10.9–13.7
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.8–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.1% (2.3–21.1%) n=507
Uninsured 18–6423.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.9% (1.9–21.6%) n=503
No HS diploma (25+)15.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.0% (0.0–16.3%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50533.9% (14.8–65.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.6% (0.0–7.7%) n=505
Households without a vehicle9.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=507
Broadband subscription91.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.4–98.7%) n=507
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (15.9–42.9%) n=507
Homeownership rate49.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.7% (51.5–93.8%) n=507
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.3%) n=507
Foreign-born population27.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–14.6%) n=508
Single-parent households42.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.4% (40.1–81.1%) n=500
Population 65+11.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.6% (9.2–36.4%) n=508
Median age34.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (33.4–58.2) n=502
Median household income$73,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,602 ($48,743–$134,919) n=470
Median home value$429,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$458,400 ($191,360–$800,020) n=469
Median gross rent$1,753$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,534 ($828–$2,196) n=401
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.8–83.2) n=466

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured