Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95957

in Meridian, CaliforniaPopulation 680

40.97/ 100

Ranked #26,055 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #1,475 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 14.2%)

Ranked #16 of 19 Yuba City, CA ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Civic-institution access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

88.8 days/year

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.3%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

10.0%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST29th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

76.9%

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

Meridian, California (ZIP 95957), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 19% nationally (26,055th) and the bottom 14.2% of California (1,475th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: civic lies in the top 2.0% nationally, and recreation settles in the top 3.5% nationally. On the other hand, modeled extreme heat stands in the top 3.4% nationally, disaster risk is in the top 3.5% nationally, and fine-particle rests in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 4.5% nationally, and crowded housing registers in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands at the national minimum, and colon screening resides in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

In everyday language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 95645, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Yuba City, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 3%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%25.3–32.7
High blood pressure among adults37.7%33.3–42.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.3
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.4–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%7.8–10.9
Depression among adults23.9%20.4–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.5–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%34.9–44.3
Obesity among adults32.0%24.6–40.7
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.4%13.3–19.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%8.5–12.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.5%70.0–77.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.7%68.8–77.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.1–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.0%51.2–62.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.3%56.7–63.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.9%63.3–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.7–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%13.7–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%22.1–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%27.0–40.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.2%23.4–31.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.4–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.5%15.2–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%15.5–20.2
Any disability among adults37.1%32.2–42.3
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.2–12.2
Mobility disability among adults19.0%16.2–22.0
Self-care disability among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Vision disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.5%22.8–30.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.6%15.6–22.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.8%15.8–22.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.2–16.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.6–11.4
Loneliness among adults35.6%30.5–41.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6411.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)24.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription76.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate61.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population12.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households59.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+10.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age45.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$78,333$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$336,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.8 yr ± 2.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.54 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured