Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95993

in Yuba City, CaliforniaPopulation 39,046

49.01/ 100

Ranked #17,662 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #1,140 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #5 of 19 Yuba City, CA ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

42.5 per million

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.4%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

87.3 days/year

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

68%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.0%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.9%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.50%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.5%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST31st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 95993, one of several in Yuba City, California, overall, ranks in the bottom 45% nationally (17,662nd) and the bottom 34% of California (1,140th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled obesity is in the bottom 8.9% nationally. On the other side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 1.7% nationally, fine-particle lands in the top 3.5% nationally, and extreme heat lies in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled disaster risk stands in the top 4.4% nationally, and tree cover rests at the national minimum. Modeled pfas registers in the top 5.0% nationally, and crowded housing resides in the top 6.7% nationally. Modeled nitrate settles in the top 7.3% nationally, and colon screening is in the bottom 8.2% nationally.

Defined simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 95982, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Yuba City, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 42.5 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 80.6 ± 1.7 years.

    Ranked #342 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.5%20.6–26.7
High blood pressure among adults33.7%29.7–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.5–7.9
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Depression among adults20.4%17.4–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.3–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%33.0–42.1
Obesity among adults26.9%20.4–34.8
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.4–15.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.5–11.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.8%69.5–76.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.5%68.5–76.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.7–86.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.5%51.9–62.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.1%54.3–61.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%64.7–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.0–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%11.6–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%22.8–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%28.6–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.1%21.4–27.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.1–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.9–17.5
Any disability among adults32.8%28.7–37.4
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.9
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.2
Mobility disability among adults15.9%14.0–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.6–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.6%25.7–33.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.6–21.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.9–19.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.1–15.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Loneliness among adults37.6%32.3–43.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.3–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)19.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate68.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population24.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households50.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+18.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age38.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$93,763$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$467,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,609$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured