Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95946

in Penn Valley, CaliforniaPopulation 9,958

54.39/ 100

Ranked #10,197 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #809 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

4.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40.6 per million

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

45%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27.2%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

30%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.4%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

70.7%

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

2.1%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

30.7%

in the bottom 30% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US30th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Penn Valley, California (ZIP 95946) lands in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,197th) and the top 47% of California (809th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and obesity registers in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep rests in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled fine-particle lies in the top 1.3% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 2.0% nationally, and housing-cost burden sits in the top 5.5% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk settles in the top 10.6% nationally, and extreme heat resides in the top 11.8% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 95949, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.6 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 79.6 ± 1.2 years.

    Ranked #409 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%29.0–36.5
High blood pressure among adults40.2%35.7–44.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.9%11.7–14.2
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.1–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.8–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%6.8–9.2
Depression among adults22.6%19.2–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.7–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.6%35.9–45.4
Obesity among adults27.2%20.7–34.5
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.2%6.5–10.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.5–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%76.5–82.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.5–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults90.3%89.0–91.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.7%65.8–75.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.1%64.7–71.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.2%68.3–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.5–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.1%9.3–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.4%17.3–25.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.0%24.3–36.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%17.1–22.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.4–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.0–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.2–14.6
Any disability among adults33.9%29.2–38.4
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.0–10.3
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.3–9.5
Mobility disability among adults17.2%14.7–19.7
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.4–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.4–12.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.7–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.0–9.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Loneliness among adults30.7%25.9–36.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6411.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)5.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription93.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate84.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households70.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+37.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age57.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$84,795$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$565,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$2,221$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured