Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

91210

in Glendale, CaliforniaPopulation 312

54.39/ 100

Ranked #10,207 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #810 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #238 of 371 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

11.2%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

50.2%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

69.4%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

24.7%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

23.1%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

25%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 91210, one of several in Glendale, California sits in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,207th) and the top 47% of California (810th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: floodplain exposure lies at the national minimum, and modeled obesity settles in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Working the other way, modeled loud transportation noise stands in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled colon screening is in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled transportation noise sits in the top 1.8% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water registers at the national maximum. PFOS in drinking water lands at the national maximum, and homeownership resides in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 4.5% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 91203, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.1%17.2–21.0
High blood pressure among adults28.4%25.9–30.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.3–6.4
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.0–6.4
Depression among adults21.2%19.0–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%9.0–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%33.6–38.3
Obesity among adults25.0%22.1–28.0
Stroke among adults2.8%2.4–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.6%6.2–9.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%4.9–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.0%65.0–70.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.9%68.3–73.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.0–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years50.2%46.9–53.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.2%59.8–64.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.8%66.1–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%15.3–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.9%10.0–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.9%18.5–25.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.1%33.2–38.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.2%17.0–24.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.3–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.2–17.1
Any disability among adults27.7%24.1–31.6
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.5–9.4
Mobility disability among adults11.9%9.9–14.4
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.0–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.2%26.6–33.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.0%12.5–19.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.0%11.3–18.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%10.8–16.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.8–9.9
Loneliness among adults39.6%36.2–42.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.2–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate34.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)61.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle8.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription86.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)69.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate23.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population59.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households54.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+35.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age56.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$107,656$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$951,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$3,501$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 1.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.61 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured