Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95917

in Biggs, CaliforniaPopulation 3,752

46.90/ 100

Ranked #20,280 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #1,235 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #7 of 18 Chico, CA ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

49.9 per million

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

21.3%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.5%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

54.3%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

85.9 days/year

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

12.0%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

37.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Biggs, California (ZIP 95917) ranks in the bottom 37% nationally (20,280th) and the bottom 28% of California (1,235th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 1.0% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 1.9% nationally. Modeled fine-particle registers in the top 2.0% nationally, and disaster risk rests in the top 2.8% nationally. Floodplain exposure stands in the top 3.3% nationally, modeled extreme heat lies in the top 4.0% nationally, and unemployment lands in the top 6.5% nationally. Fatal road crashes sits in the top 8.2% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise settles in the top 10.5% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Close by, ZIP 95974, about 2.0 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chico, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.5%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 3.4 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 77.4 — 74 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,737 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.3%21.5–27.2
High blood pressure among adults32.6%28.9–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Depression among adults23.9%20.5–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.5–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%31.2–39.2
Obesity among adults29.6%23.5–36.1
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.4%10.0–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.1–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.1%68.6–75.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.5%68.5–76.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.0–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.1%56.8–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.9%59.3–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%64.2–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%14.7–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%10.8–14.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.3%19.5–27.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.0%27.1–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.3%18.7–24.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.0–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.6–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.6–17.2
Any disability among adults31.6%27.5–35.9
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.4
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.5–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.2%22.6–30.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%12.6–17.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.5–15.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.3–15.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.2–9.4
Loneliness among adults34.7%29.9–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–649.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)10.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)12.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription95.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate70.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population8.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households43.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+13.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age32.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$90,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$362,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$898$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 2.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.12 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured