Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95374

in Stevinson, CaliforniaPopulation 1,921

25.32/ 100

Ranked #31,435 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.0%)

Ranked #1,710 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 0.6%)

Ranked #19 of 19 Merced, CA ZIPs (bottom 5.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

47.5%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

37%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.1%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

24%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

63.8%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.9%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.9%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

102.8 days/year

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

20.5%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

23.2%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Stevinson, California (ZIP 95374) sits in the bottom 2.0% nationally (31,435th) and the bottom 0.6% of California (1,710th).

continue reading

A rural profile defined by a handful of clear readings: modeled colon screening registers in the bottom 1.3% nationally, fair or poor health is in the top 1.6% nationally, and vision disability lies in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 1.6% nationally, mammography is in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled self-care disability registers in the top 3.0% nationally, and extreme heat is in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled uninsured lies in the top 4.1% nationally, and nitrate registers in the top 2.0% nationally.

Put plainly, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 93635, just across the boundary. Across other measures, the ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Merced, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.08%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.9%22.0–27.9
High blood pressure among adults35.8%31.9–39.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.7–11.4
Depression among adults25.6%22.1–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.4–17.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%32.9–41.4
Obesity among adults38.6%31.3–46.4
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.9%20.1–28.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years20.5%17.1–24.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.0%65.6–72.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.7%64.3–73.1
Cholesterol screening among adults78.2%75.4–81.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years47.5%42.2–53.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.4%44.8–52.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.8%54.8–72.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%12.8–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.8%17.9–23.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.6%33.4–44.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.7%32.4–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults37.0%32.8–41.4
Frequent mental distress among adults22.4%20.0–25.0
Frequent physical distress among adults20.4%18.1–22.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults24.0%21.3–27.0
Any disability among adults43.3%38.5–48.3
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Independent living disability among adults14.9%13.1–16.9
Mobility disability among adults22.3%19.5–25.1
Self-care disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Vision disability among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.2%26.1–34.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults36.2%31.6–41.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults37.7%33.2–42.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.1%23.7–30.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults18.0%15.8–20.5
Loneliness among adults40.0%34.5–45.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.0%14.0–18.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–649.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)30.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)10.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle10.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription71.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate55.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)12.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population26.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households40.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+10.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age31.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$57,538$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$463,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,192$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.0 yr ± 1.3478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.34 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured