Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92583

in San Jacinto, CaliforniaPopulation 33,778

42.23/ 100

Ranked #25,021 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #1,420 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #120 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

31.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

24.3%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

29.8%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.0%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

14.7%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38.6%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.3%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.8%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 92583, one of several in San Jacinto, California ranks in the bottom 22% nationally (25,021st) and the bottom 17% of California (1,420th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled disaster risk registers in the top 1.2% nationally, and expected annual loss lies in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health is in the top 6.2% nationally, and housing insecurity registers in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lies in the top 6.2% nationally, crowded housing is in the top 6.8% nationally, and modeled transportation registers in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled loneliness lies in the top 7.0% nationally, unemployment is in the top 7.3% nationally, and modeled vision disability registers in the top 8.3% nationally.

Against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 92544, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.1 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $68,351 predicts 78.6 years — 2.5 years below.

    Ranked #3,428 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.1 ± 1.0 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.7 years — 2.6 years below them.

    Ranked #2,036 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.7%23.6–28.0
High blood pressure among adults35.7%33.0–38.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.0%5.5–6.6
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.3–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Depression among adults23.7%21.0–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%13.1–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%34.4–40.2
Obesity among adults41.3%37.1–45.7
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.0%12.3–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.2%15.0–19.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.4%67.7–73.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.1%68.0–74.0
Cholesterol screening among adults82.3%80.4–84.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.2%52.8–61.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.8%50.5–57.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%70.3–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.7–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%13.2–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.6%30.2–37.3
Short sleep duration among adults41.0%36.8–45.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.3%28.6–34.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.8–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%16.1–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.0%18.0–22.0
Any disability among adults41.1%37.8–44.6
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.5–8.1
Independent living disability among adults12.0%10.8–13.2
Mobility disability among adults20.2%18.2–22.2
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.4
Vision disability among adults8.8%8.1–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.9%26.9–33.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.8%26.9–32.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults27.4%24.7–30.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.3%21.8–26.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.7%13.2–16.4
Loneliness among adults38.6%35.1–42.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.8%11.3–14.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6414.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)21.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)11.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate68.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population20.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households41.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+14.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age34.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$68,351$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$372,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,474$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 0.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.52 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured