Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92395

in Victorville, CaliforniaPopulation 47,375

41.57/ 100

Ranked #25,593 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #1,454 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #124 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

53.6%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST17th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

592 units

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

46.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

30.9%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

39.1%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.6%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

22.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.0%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

15.0%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 92395, one of several in Victorville, California stands in the bottom 20% nationally (25,593rd) and the bottom 15% of California (1,454th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 3.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 3.8% nationally, housing-cost burden sits in the top 4.7% nationally, and modeled tree cover resides at the national minimum. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the top 6.8% nationally, modeled loneliness sits in the top 5.9% nationally, and crowded housing resides in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity stands in the top 6.0% nationally, and vision disability sits in the top 7.6% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. ZIP 92307, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.6 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $62,102 predicts 78.2 years — 2.6 years below.

    Ranked #3,647 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.6 ± 0.9 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.4 years — 2.8 years below them.

    Ranked #2,235 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.4%23.1–27.8
High blood pressure among adults36.2%33.2–39.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.5–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.2
Depression among adults21.7%19.1–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.7–15.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%32.4–38.5
Obesity among adults36.7%32.3–41.2
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.1%14.2–20.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.8%13.9–17.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.8%67.9–73.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.8%67.5–73.8
Cholesterol screening among adults82.5%80.6–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.6%49.3–58.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.4%47.3–53.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.1%64.4–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.3–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.8–17.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.4%27.0–33.8
Short sleep duration among adults39.5%35.4–44.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.9%28.3–33.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.9–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%15.4–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.6–21.2
Any disability among adults37.0%33.7–40.4
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.8–13.1
Mobility disability among adults18.4%16.5–20.2
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.7–6.6
Vision disability among adults9.0%8.3–9.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.8%27.5–34.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.5%26.5–32.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.2%27.5–32.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.6%20.1–25.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.0%13.5–16.5
Loneliness among adults39.1%35.2–43.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.6%11.1–14.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–648.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)19.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)11.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle6.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate52.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population18.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households36.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+13.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age33.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$62,102$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$375,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,600$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.6 yr ± 0.4878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.48 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured