ZIP code
92563
in Murrieta, CaliforniaPopulation 80,379
60.24/ 100
Ranked #4,674 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.6%)
Ranked #497 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 29%)
Ranked #6 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (top 4.0%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the top 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS98thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.9%
in the bottom 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
4.5%
in the bottom 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Median household income
$125,397
in the top 8.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST76thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
97.4%
in the top 9.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST85thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Stroke
2.5%
in the bottom 6.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mammography
80.8%
in the top 7.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
29.3%
in the bottom 9.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST27thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
91.6%
in the top 14.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS86thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›The read
ZIP 92563, one of several in Murrieta, California, by its overall standing, sits in the top 14.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,674th) and the top 29% of California (497th).
The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 5.7% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and household income settles in the top 8.1% nationally. Home broadband subscription registers in the top 9.0% nationally, and modeled stroke stands in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Modeled mammography lands in the top 7.4% nationally. Distance to a community health center is at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled high blood pressure resides in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Set against that, modeled disaster risk rests in the top 2.4% nationally.
Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 92592, about 1.2 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 92%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 69%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 77%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 73%
11%
Disability
healthier than 83%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 93%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 53%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 48%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 32%
13%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 76%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 64%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 86%
14%
Disability
healthier than 78%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 87%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 55%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 50%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 46%
8%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 38%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 94%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 82%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 72%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 74%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 60%
8%
Disability
healthier than 94%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 70%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 85%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 58%
14%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Above its nearby ZIPs
The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors
Estimated life expectancy is 82.0 ± 1.2 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.9 years — 2.0 years above them.
Ranked #1,380 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
92562
Californiashares a border
Score 58.91
Closest healthier
92592
Californiaabout 1.2 mi away
Score 61.83
Similar health profile
93064
California98% similar profile
Score 65.85
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 21.4% | 19.4–23.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 29.3% | 26.8–31.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.0% | 5.4–6.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.6% | 8.6–10.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.5% | 4.1–5.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 4.1% | 3.7–4.6 |
| Depression among adults | 22.4% | 19.9–25.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.6% | 8.5–10.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 34.4% | 31.6–37.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 32.8% | 29.0–36.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.5% | 2.3–2.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 7.8% | 6.3–9.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.3% | 6.3–8.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 68.5% | 65.5–71.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 72.0% | 69.0–75.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.4% | 84.9–87.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 60.6% | 56.4–64.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 66.9% | 63.9–69.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 80.8% | 75.4–85.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.8% | 13.6–18.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 9.9% | 8.6–11.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 21.1% | 18.5–23.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.4% | 34.3–42.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 17.9% | 16.1–19.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.9% | 15.2–18.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.1% | 10.8–13.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 13.6% | 12.3–15.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 28.3% | 25.6–31.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.9% | 4.4–5.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.0% | 6.4–7.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.7% | 10.4–13.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.9% | 2.7–3.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.1% | 3.8–4.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.1% | 24.3–30.2 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.6% | 12.0–15.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.7% | 9.3–12.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.0% | 11.5–14.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.6% | 6.8–8.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 36.3% | 32.8–40.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.4% | 5.6–7.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 4.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 5.4% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 7.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 33.6% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.6% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 97.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 37.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 74.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 4.3% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 19.8% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 43.8% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 11.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 35.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | $125,397 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | $645,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | $2,625 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.9 yr ± 0.61 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 81.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured