Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92305

in Angelus Oaks, CaliforniaPopulation 533

55.57/ 100

Ranked #8,775 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #744 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #35 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

91.4%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

1.8 days/year

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

11.8%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$145,536

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18.9 per million

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.9%

in the bottom 13.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

12.8 mi

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Angelus Oaks, California (ZIP 92305) comes out in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,775th) and the top 43% of California (744th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: park land is in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and household income rests in the top 4.4% nationally. Floodplain exposure lies at the national minimum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the bottom 7.1% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Set against that, slow internet speeds registers in the top 1.3% nationally, and modeled disaster risk stands in the top 4.2% nationally. Walkability lands in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 92373, about 8.7 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.07%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%26.2–31.9
High blood pressure among adults36.2%33.1–39.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.8–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.6–8.4
Depression among adults22.2%19.4–25.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.8–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%35.2–42.0
Obesity among adults31.1%27.0–35.5
Stroke among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%9.0–13.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.3–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.0%70.7–76.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.9%70.7–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%86.5–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.1%58.1–66.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.3%59.2–65.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%66.1–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.6–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.1%9.4–14.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.0%16.7–23.7
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%30.7–39.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%17.5–24.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.4–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.3–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%11.6–16.0
Any disability among adults29.7%25.9–33.8
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.2
Independent living disability among adults8.1%6.8–9.6
Mobility disability among adults14.3%12.1–17.1
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.3–4.8
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.3%20.9–28.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%9.5–15.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.1%9.2–15.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.5–12.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.9–8.5
Loneliness among adults33.5%29.5–37.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.7–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)5.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)55.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription93.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate85.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households65.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+11.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age37.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$145,536$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$559,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 2.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.78 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured