ZIP code
92385
in Skyforest, CaliforniaPopulation 198
57.23/ 100
Ranked #7,038 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)
Ranked #659 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 38%)
Ranked #24 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (top 16%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Park land
88%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›PFOA in drinking water
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.
Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.
Full methodology ›PFOS in drinking water
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.
Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the top 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST80thUS95thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.
Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
69.9%
in the top 21% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST92ndUS79thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
87.4%
in the top 24% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS76thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
75.8%
in the top 26% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS74thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›The read
Skyforest, California (ZIP 92385), overall, ranks in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,038th) and the top 38% of California (659th).
This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: park land resides in the top 0.4% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles at the national minimum. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat sits in the bottom 13.2% nationally. Set against that, PFOA in drinking water lands at the national maximum, and PFOS in drinking water lies at the national maximum. Modeled disaster risk stands in the top 4.8% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water rests at the national maximum. Modeled loud transportation noise registers in the top 12.2% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 13.0% nationally.
Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 92352, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 87%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 60%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 77%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 69%
8%
Disability
healthier than 64%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 87%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 65%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 56%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 54%
13%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 82%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 78%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 73%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 65%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 71%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 57%
11%
Disability
healthier than 60%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 42%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 23%
21%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 98%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 89%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 81%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 82%
8%
Disability
healthier than 81%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 92%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 43%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 40%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 33%
21%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
92321
Californiashares a border
Score 52.05
Closest healthier
92352
Californiashares a border
Score 57.60
Similar health profile
32504
Florida99% similar profile
Score 56.92
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 29.4% | 26.1–32.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 38.1% | 34.4–41.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.0% | 8.9–11.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.2% | 8.9–11.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.9% | 6.4–9.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.3% | 5.5–9.6 |
| Depression among adults | 21.3% | 18.4–24.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.9% | 9.8–14.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 40.2% | 36.7–43.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 31.1% | 26.6–35.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.8% | 3.1–4.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 9.3% | 7.4–11.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.6% | 5.5–10.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 74.7% | 71.3–77.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 73.9% | 70.6–76.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.7% | 86.7–90.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 69.9% | 65.4–74.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 64.0% | 60.9–67.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 76.4% | 70.4–82.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.9% | 13.4–18.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 13.1% | 9.7–16.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 19.7% | 15.9–24.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.4% | 30.5–38.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 21.0% | 16.9–25.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.9% | 13.7–18.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.2% | 11.8–17.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 13.3% | 10.9–15.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 29.1% | 24.4–34.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.3% | 6.0–8.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.6% | 6.1–9.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 14.0% | 11.1–17.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.9% | 3.1–5.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.6% | 3.8–5.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.0% | 21.3–29.2 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 9.2–15.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 12.3% | 8.9–16.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.1% | 8.0–12.4 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.9% | 5.5–8.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.9% | 28.9–37.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.4% | 4.3–6.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 5.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 5.1% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 57.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 90.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 26.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 87.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 12.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 72.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 47.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 61.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | $560,500 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.5 yr ± 2.11 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.11 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured