Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92268

in Pioneertown, CaliforniaPopulation 434

44.67/ 100

Ranked #22,743 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #1,330 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #110 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Coronary heart disease

12.0%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

57%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.0%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.4%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

49.2%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

32.9%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

14 per million

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.7%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

Pioneertown, California (ZIP 92268), overall, ranks in the bottom 29% nationally (22,743rd) and the bottom 23% of California (1,330th).

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 1.8% nationally, housing-cost burden is in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled stroke sits in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 2.2% nationally, modeled high blood pressure lies in the top 4.3% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water stands at the national maximum. Poverty rests in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled mobility disability registers in the top 7.5% nationally. More encouragingly, floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 6.0% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 92284, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.8%37.3–44.1
High blood pressure among adults49.2%45.4–52.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.5%12.2–14.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults12.0%10.5–13.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.8%9.8–14.1
Depression among adults21.9%19.1–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.2%14.9–19.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.4%42.7–50.0
Obesity among adults34.8%30.4–39.2
Stroke among adults6.0%5.2–6.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%11.8–17.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.0–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%77.6–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%76.4–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults91.3%89.8–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%55.7–65.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.9%54.5–61.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.9%64.2–77.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%10.1–13.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%13.0–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.4%22.1–30.7
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%31.1–39.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.2%24.2–32.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.0–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults19.0%16.4–21.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%12.5–17.1
Any disability among adults38.3%33.7–42.9
Hearing disability among adults11.1%9.6–12.5
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.3–12.9
Mobility disability among adults22.7%19.4–26.4
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.3–7.4
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.1–8.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.3–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.9%12.1–18.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.4%14.0–21.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.6–12.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.7–9.4
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.4–35.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.4–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate32.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)7.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription80.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)57.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate71.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population21.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+42.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age64.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$58,798$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$701,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,847$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 1.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.23 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured