Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24326

in Elk Creek, VirginiaPopulation 858

40.85/ 100

Ranked #26,155 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #761 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 12.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Coronary heart disease

12.3%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

47.5%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.4%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.3%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.7%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.7%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.7%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.07%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.4%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Elk Creek, Virginia (ZIP 24326) comes out in the bottom 18% nationally (26,155th) and the bottom 12.9% of Virginia (761st).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 1.4% nationally, high cholesterol registers in the top 1.1% nationally, and hearing disability stands in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled diabetes lands in the top 5.0% nationally, stroke is in the top 4.7% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure rests in the top 4.9% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and transportation noise sits in the bottom 7.7% nationally. Homeownership settles in the top 9.5% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 24322, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 1.0%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.4%36.3–44.4
High blood pressure among adults48.7%44.0–53.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.2%11.0–13.5
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.2%11.3–15.3
Depression among adults23.7%20.1–27.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.3%16.7–22.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened47.5%42.7–52.4
Obesity among adults40.2%32.0–49.0
Stroke among adults5.9%5.3–6.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.6%16.3–23.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.5%8.5–12.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.8%81.2–86.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.9%78.8–85.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.6–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.3%61.4–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.8%56.2–63.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.0%62.6–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.5–14.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.3%16.3–22.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.2%28.7–40.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%29.3–42.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.6%23.8–31.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.7–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults19.2%16.8–21.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.0–19.6
Any disability among adults42.7%37.4–48.1
Hearing disability among adults12.4%10.9–13.9
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.0–13.2
Mobility disability among adults23.7%20.5–27.2
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%17.6–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%13.4–19.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.6%12.9–18.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.0–12.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.3–9.7
Loneliness among adults32.5%27.5–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.5–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)9.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate94.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households66.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+42.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age59.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$42,400$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$150,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.5 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 76.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured