Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03592

in Pittsburg, New HampshirePopulation 1,054

45.75/ 100

Ranked #21,603 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #238 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 2.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

13.2%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.9%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

85.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.0%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.8%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

5.5 days/year

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.7%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Pittsburg, New Hampshire (ZIP 03592), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 33% nationally (21,603rd) and the bottom 2.1% of New Hampshire (238th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled hearing disability is in the top 1.6% nationally, and coronary heart disease lands in the top 1.9% nationally. Modeled stroke stands in the top 4.1% nationally, and energy burden registers in the top 4.1% nationally. Slow internet speeds settles in the top 4.8% nationally. More encouragingly, fatal road crashes sits at the national minimum, modeled tree cover lies in the top 2.8% nationally, and modeled binge drinking rests in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 5.2% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 03576, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.5%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.5%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 97.3 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 3.6 (bottom 10%) — 94 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #45 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults43.0%39.2–46.8
High blood pressure among adults47.7%43.6–51.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.0%12.6–15.5
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults11.9%10.3–13.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.2%10.9–15.8
Depression among adults21.5%18.4–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.6%15.1–20.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.2%41.1–49.4
Obesity among adults37.9%32.2–44.0
Stroke among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.2%11.0–15.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%6.2–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.2%82.4–87.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.1%80.1–86.0
Cholesterol screening among adults91.2%89.6–92.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.3%62.6–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.7%57.0–64.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%67.9–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.8%8.8–13.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%13.5–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.2%27.7–38.8
Short sleep duration among adults30.9%26.1–35.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.7%20.5–29.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%12.7–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.1–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.0–16.7
Any disability among adults40.0%34.6–45.1
Hearing disability among adults13.2%11.5–14.8
Independent living disability among adults10.2%8.5–12.0
Mobility disability among adults22.1%18.5–26.0
Self-care disability among adults5.6%4.7–6.7
Vision disability among adults6.8%5.7–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.1–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.5%10.4–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.3%8.5–14.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.0–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.7–8.4
Loneliness among adults30.2%25.9–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.2–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–6415.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)5.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)9.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription84.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate88.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households83.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+41.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age61.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$61,094$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$279,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,042$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured