ZIP code
92230
in Cabazon, CaliforniaPopulation 1,887
46.82/ 100
Ranked #20,371 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)
Ranked #1,242 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 28%)
Ranked #91 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 41%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Fatal road crashes
68.9 per 100,000 residents per year
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.
A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
13.5%
in the top 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
49%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
38.6%
in the top 7.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST74thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
20.8%
in the top 7.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST82ndUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
28.8%
in the top 10.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS89thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
92.8%
in the top 12.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS87thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
78.7%
in the bottom 14.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST7thUS15thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
40.2%
in the top 16% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS84thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›The read
Cabazon, California (ZIP 92230), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 36% nationally (20,371st) and the bottom 28% of California (1,242nd).
A few readings each way define this mixed profile: fatal road crashes is in the top 1.5% nationally. Pulling the other way, crowded housing lies in the top 2.7% nationally, housing-cost burden registers in the top 3.5% nationally, and modeled tree cover is at the national minimum. Modeled loneliness lies in the top 7.0% nationally, and housing insecurity registers in the top 7.9% nationally. Floodplain exposure is in the top 10.7% nationally, and poverty lies in the top 11.6% nationally. Unemployment registers in the top 12.4% nationally, and modeled food insecurity is in the top 12.7% nationally.
Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 92549, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 75%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
About typical
Healthcare Access
healthier than 49%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 9%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 11%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 34%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 25%
8%
Disability
healthier than 32%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 22%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 95%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 40%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 15%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 30%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 17%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 14%
8%
Disability
healthier than 31%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 21%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 30%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 88%
14%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 53%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 42%
13%
Disability
healthier than 44%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 25%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 24%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 11%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 24%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 26%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
92220
Californiashares a border
Score 45.51
Closest healthier
92549
Californiashares a border
Score 58.49
Similar health profile
32304
Florida95% similar profile
Score 44.49
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 24.0% | 21.8–26.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 32.8% | 30.0–35.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 5.8% | 5.3–6.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.4% | 9.2–11.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.9% | 5.2–6.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.1% | 5.3–7.0 |
| Depression among adults | 23.8% | 21.1–26.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 12.3% | 10.9–14.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 36.0% | 33.1–39.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.0% | 34.9–43.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.3% | 3.0–3.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.0% | 9.0–13.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.4% | 11.4–17.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 68.3% | 65.3–71.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 70.0% | 66.7–73.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.5% | 81.3–85.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 59.3% | 54.9–63.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.5% | 55.3–61.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.5% | 71.3–82.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.2% | 13.0–17.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.2% | 12.1–16.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 29.3% | 25.5–33.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.2% | 36.1–44.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 27.0% | 23.6–30.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.4% | 17.2–21.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.2% | 14.3–18.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.4% | 16.1–20.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 37.1% | 33.1–41.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.5–7.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.2% | 8.8–11.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 17.0% | 14.9–19.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.7% | 4.2–5.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.8% | 6.0–7.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 30.2% | 26.8–33.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 23.9% | 20.3–27.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 20.2% | 17.0–23.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 20.8% | 17.9–23.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.9% | 10.3–13.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 38.6% | 34.9–42.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 10.0% | 8.7–11.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 24.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 15.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 25.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 8.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 8.9% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 7.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 78.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 49.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 60.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 13.5% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 17.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 49.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 11.6% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 31.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | $48,704 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | $270,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | $1,519 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.6 yr ± 2.91 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.91 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured