ZIP code
92582
in San Jacinto, CaliforniaPopulation 23,356
49.16/ 100
Ranked #17,432 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 46%)
Ranked #1,128 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 34%)
Ranked #78 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 49%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Colon-cancer screening
53.6%
in the bottom 3.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST17thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
13.0%
in the top 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
39.2%
in the top 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST79thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
21.9%
in the top 6.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
97.4%
in the top 8.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST85thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
5.3%
in the bottom 9.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST22ndUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
4.9%
in the bottom 8.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST20thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
40.8%
in the top 13.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS87thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
89.2%
in the top 16% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS84thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
87.2%
in the top 25% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS75thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, ZIP 92582, one of several in San Jacinto, California stands in the bottom 46% nationally (17,432nd) and the bottom 34% of California (1,128th).
A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: home broadband subscription registers in the top 8.9% nationally, and modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease is in the bottom 8.7% nationally. On the other side, modeled colon screening registers in the bottom 3.8% nationally, crowded housing lies in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled loneliness is in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity registers in the top 6.6% nationally, extreme heat lies in the top 10.6% nationally, and disaster risk is in the top 10.9% nationally. Modeled food insecurity registers in the top 11.2% nationally.
Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 92555, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 87%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 82%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 87%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 42%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 17%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 7%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 37%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 33%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 20%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 62%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 89%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 72%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 23%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 21%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 19%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 22%
8%
Disability
healthier than 39%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 17%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 79%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 68%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 73%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 40%
16%
Disability
healthier than 56%
7%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 29%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 30%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 24%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 19%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
92543
Californiashares a border
Score 36.07
Closest healthier
92555
Californiashares a border
Score 54.59
Similar health profile
89081
Nevada97% similar profile
Score 49.09
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 20.5% | 18.6–22.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 30.2% | 27.6–32.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 4.6% | 4.2–5.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.9% | 8.8–11.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.9% | 4.4–5.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 4.8% | 4.3–5.4 |
| Depression among adults | 22.7% | 20.2–25.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.5% | 10.2–12.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 33.6% | 30.8–36.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.5% | 34.4–42.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.8% | 2.6–3.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 12.0% | 9.8–14.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.9% | 12.7–17.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 65.8% | 62.7–68.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 69.1% | 65.7–72.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 82.3% | 80.2–84.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 53.6% | 49.1–58.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 56.9% | 53.6–60.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.2% | 72.4–83.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.5% | 13.2–17.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 12.6% | 11.0–14.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 28.8% | 25.6–32.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.8% | 36.6–45.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 25.9% | 23.4–28.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.1% | 17.2–21.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.9% | 13.4–16.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.1% | 16.2–20.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 35.3% | 32.1–38.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 5.3% | 4.8–6.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.6% | 8.6–10.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 15.1% | 13.5–16.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.3% | 3.9–4.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.7% | 6.1–7.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 30.5% | 27.4–34.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 24.9% | 21.9–28.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 20.5% | 18.0–23.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 21.9% | 19.5–24.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 11.0–14.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 39.2% | 35.6–43.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 9.3–12.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 12.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 9.6% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 19.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 16.2% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 5.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.4% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 97.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 38.7% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 87.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 13.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 22.4% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 40.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 7.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 31.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | $105,540 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | $485,100 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | $3,146 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.4 yr ± 1.04 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured