ZIP code
92220
in Banning, CaliforniaPopulation 33,755
45.51/ 100
Ranked #21,860 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)
Ranked #1,292 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 25%)
Ranked #103 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 33%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the top 2.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS98thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Park land
30.9%
in the top 4.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST86thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
29.9%
in the top 8.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
12.0%
in the bottom 6.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
22.2%
in the top 9.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
6.9%
in the top 8.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST63rdUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
41.1%
in the top 8.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST64thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
77.7%
in the top 25% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST92ndUS75thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, Banning, California (ZIP 92220) lands in the bottom 32% nationally (21,860th) and the bottom 25% of California (1,292nd).
Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled disaster risk is in the top 0.6% nationally, expected annual loss sits in the top 2.2% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lies in the top 9.0% nationally, crowded housing stands in the top 8.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity registers in the top 10.5% nationally. More encouragingly, park land resides in the top 4.6% nationally, and modeled binge drinking settles in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing is in the top 10.5% nationally.
Against the wider neighborhood, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. On the overall standing, ZIP 92223, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 79%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 63%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 94%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 55%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 48%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 31%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 14%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 23%
13%
Disability
healthier than 13%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 87%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 90%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 46%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 40%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 47%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 12%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 21%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 31%
11%
Disability
healthier than 13%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 61%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 63%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 81%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 88%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 49%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 50%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 19%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 36%
16%
Disability
healthier than 15%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 76.8 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $62,599 predicts 78.2 years — 1.4 years below.
Ranked #1,720 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
92223
Californiashares a border
Score 55.11
Closest healthier
92230
Californiashares a border
Score 46.82
Similar health profile
88352
New Mexico95% similar profile
Score 42.33
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 31.2% | 28.8–33.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 40.7% | 37.8–43.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.0% | 8.1–9.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.1% | 9.1–11.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.9% | 8.0–9.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.1% | 7.1–9.2 |
| Depression among adults | 22.2% | 19.8–24.9 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.6% | 13.9–17.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.3% | 38.4–44.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.1% | 34.2–42.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.7% | 4.3–5.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 15.6% | 12.7–18.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 15.1% | 13.1–17.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 76.0% | 73.4–78.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 74.8% | 72.0–77.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.3% | 83.7–86.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.0% | 57.7–66.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 56.8% | 53.6–60.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.1% | 72.1–83.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.0% | 10.3–13.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 13.7% | 12.0–15.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.5% | 29.1–36.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.5% | 34.4–42.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 29.9% | 27.1–32.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.6% | 15.9–19.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.8% | 16.1–19.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.8% | 16.0–19.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.4% | 39.0–45.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.3% | 8.3–10.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.6% | 10.4–12.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.2% | 20.0–24.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.7% | 5.2–6.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.2% | 7.5–9.0 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.3% | 25.3–31.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 24.1% | 21.6–26.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 22.0% | 19.8–24.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.0% | 17.0–21.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.0% | 10.8–13.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 36.8% | 33.3–40.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 10.0% | 8.8–11.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 18.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 12.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 17.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 16.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 8.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 7.5% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 88.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 41.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 70.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 6.9% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 17.8% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 51.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 26.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 41.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | $62,599 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | $354,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | $1,629 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.8 yr ± 0.67 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured