Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

91355

in Valencia, CaliforniaPopulation 29,123

63.44/ 100

Ranked #2,743 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.6%)

Ranked #337 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #112 of 371 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dental provider access

2.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.3%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.24 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 91355, one of several in Valencia, California lands in the top 8.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,743rd) and the top 20% of California (337th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: dental providers lands in the top 0.7% nationally, recreation lies in the top 1.9% nationally, and outpatient stands in the top 1.9% nationally. Modeled obesity rests in the bottom 3.3% nationally, physicians registers in the top 2.2% nationally, and mental-health providers resides in the top 3.0% nationally. Civic settles in the top 3.0% nationally. On the other side, PFOA in drinking water is at the national maximum, and modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 1.9% nationally. PFOS in drinking water lands at the national maximum.

Against the wider neighborhood, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. On the overall standing, ZIP 91354, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.9 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $115,640 predicts 80.7 years — 2.2 years above.

    Ranked #817 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.4%19.8–23.1
High blood pressure among adults28.7%26.7–30.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.3–8.6
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Depression among adults20.9%18.9–22.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%34.6–39.1
Obesity among adults23.3%20.8–25.8
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.9%5.6–8.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.7–6.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.9%70.5–75.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.9%71.6–76.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.0%86.8–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.8%58.5–64.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.2%67.9–72.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%72.4–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%14.8–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.3%16.4–20.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%29.9–35.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%15.2–18.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.9–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.8–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%11.1–13.4
Any disability among adults26.3%24.2–28.4
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Independent living disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.3
Mobility disability among adults11.4%10.3–12.5
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.1%24.0–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Loneliness among adults37.6%35.1–40.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)49.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)7.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription95.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate67.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population20.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households50.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$115,640$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$806,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$2,749$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.8 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured