ZIP code
93064
in Brandeis, CaliforniaPopulation 0
65.85/ 100
Ranked #1,677 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.3%)
Ranked #241 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 14.1%)
Ranked #5 of 27 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA ZIPs (top 19%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Obesity
21.9%
in the bottom 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
24.8%
in the bottom 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.0%
in the bottom 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
2.4%
in the bottom 0.03% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
3.9%
in the bottom 3.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
2.1%
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
8.8%
in the bottom 5.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Energy-cost burden
1.8%
in the bottom 9.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST32ndUS9thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
6.0%
in the bottom 9.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST13thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›The read
Brandeis, California (ZIP 93064), on the composite measure, lands in the top 5.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,677th) and the top 14.1% of California (241st), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled obesity lands in the bottom 2.0% nationally, transportation noise resides at the national minimum, and high blood pressure lies in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 2.1% nationally, tooth loss stands in the bottom 0.03% nationally, and coronary heart disease is in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Working the other way, fiber broadband lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.
Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 91377, about 2.6 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 85%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 69%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 82%
11%
Disability
healthier than 93%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 82%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 70%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 55%
8%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 36%
13%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 95%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 79%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 83%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 64%
11%
Disability
healthier than 90%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 63%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 58%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 48%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 47%
5%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 97%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 63%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 85%
14%
Disability
healthier than 94%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 89%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 41%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 44%
11%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 24%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 16%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
93063
Californiashares a border
Score 61.66
Closest healthier
91377
Californiaabout 2.6 mi away
Score 69.20
Similar health profile
94117
California99% similar profile
Score 68.96
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 14.7% | 12.6–17.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 24.8% | 21.6–28.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 4.6% | 4.1–5.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.5% | 8.3–10.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 3.9% | 3.2–4.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 3.4% | 2.6–4.4 |
| Depression among adults | 22.2% | 19.0–25.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.6% | 8.0–11.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 33.2% | 29.7–36.8 |
| Obesity among adults | 21.9% | 17.6–26.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.1% | 1.8–2.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 2.4% | 1.8–3.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.7% | 4.0–8.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 66.3% | 62.0–70.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 72.3% | 68.4–76.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.0% | 83.9–89.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.0% | 60.2–69.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 63.3% | 60.2–66.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.8% | 73.5–85.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.1% | 14.4–20.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 9.0% | 6.6–12.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 18.5% | 14.5–23.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.3% | 30.6–40.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 16.4% | 13.1–20.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.9% | 14.2–19.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 10.6% | 8.8–12.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.6% | 10.0–15.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 23.0% | 18.7–28.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.0% | 3.3–4.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.0% | 4.7–7.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 8.8% | 7.0–11.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.6% | 2.1–3.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.6% | 2.9–4.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.1% | 20.0–28.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.5% | 8.2–15.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.0% | 6.1–12.7 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.5% | 8.0–13.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.7% | 5.1–8.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.0% | 29.0–38.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.0% | 3.9–6.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | — | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | — | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | — | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | — | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | — | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 82.8 yr ± 2.99 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.99 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured